SLAB vs. CRUS

In the year-to-date period, SLAB achieves a -17.28% return, which is significantly lower than CRUS's -6.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SLAB has underperformed CRUS with an annualized return of 6.96%, while CRUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SLAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the CRUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLAB and CRUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither SLAB nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum SLAB drawdown since its inception was -89.29%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLAB and CRUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) has a higher volatility of 29.38% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) at 23.18%. This indicates that SLAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Laboratories Inc. and Cirrus Logic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.