PortfoliosLab logo
SLAB vs. CRUS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SLAB and CRUS is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SLAB vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SLAB:

0.03

CRUS:

-0.07

Sortino Ratio

SLAB:

0.55

CRUS:

0.34

Omega Ratio

SLAB:

1.07

CRUS:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

SLAB:

0.11

CRUS:

0.03

Martin Ratio

SLAB:

0.37

CRUS:

0.05

Ulcer Index

SLAB:

18.14%

CRUS:

23.57%

Daily Std Dev

SLAB:

52.31%

CRUS:

42.08%

Max Drawdown

SLAB:

-89.29%

CRUS:

-97.48%

Current Drawdown

SLAB:

-36.71%

CRUS:

-26.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLAB:

$4.34B

CRUS:

$5.70B

EPS

SLAB:

-$5.92

CRUS:

$6.00

PEG Ratio

SLAB:

3.03

CRUS:

8.09

PS Ratio

SLAB:

7.42

CRUS:

3.01

PB Ratio

SLAB:

4.02

CRUS:

2.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLAB:

$655.73M

CRUS:

$1.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLAB:

$348.82M

CRUS:

$996.04M

EBITDA (TTM)

SLAB:

-$93.31M

CRUS:

$464.71M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLAB achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than CRUS's 7.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SLAB has underperformed CRUS with an annualized return of 9.97%, while CRUS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.65% annualized return.


SLAB

YTD

7.04%

1M

45.64%

6M

25.60%

1Y

1.77%

5Y*

8.03%

10Y*

9.97%

CRUS

YTD

7.89%

1M

22.91%

6M

7.02%

1Y

-2.92%

5Y*

10.42%

10Y*

11.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLAB vs. CRUS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLAB is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLAB is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLAB is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLAB is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLAB is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLAB is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CRUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRUS is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRUS is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRUS is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRUS is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRUS is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRUS is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SLAB vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SLAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the CRUS Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLAB and CRUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SLAB vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLAB nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SLAB vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLAB drawdown since its inception was -89.29%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLAB and CRUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SLAB vs. CRUS - Volatility Comparison

Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) has a higher volatility of 12.98% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) at 8.20%. This indicates that SLAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SLAB vs. CRUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Laboratories Inc. and Cirrus Logic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20212022202320242025
177.71M
424.46M
(SLAB) Total Revenue
(CRUS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SLAB vs. CRUS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silicon Laboratories Inc. and Cirrus Logic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%20212022202320242025
55.0%
53.4%
(SLAB) Gross Margin
(CRUS) Gross Margin
SLAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a gross profit of 97.78M and revenue of 177.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

CRUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 226.74M and revenue of 424.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.4%.

SLAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported an operating income of -32.08M and revenue of 177.71M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.1%.

CRUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 85.95M and revenue of 424.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

SLAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a net income of -30.47M and revenue of 177.71M, resulting in a net margin of -17.2%.

CRUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 71.27M and revenue of 424.46M, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.