PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SLAB vs. CRUS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SLABCRUS
YTD Return-1.57%32.25%
1Y Return-6.99%38.74%
3Y Return (Ann)1.58%14.30%
5Y Return (Ann)6.45%21.14%
10Y Return (Ann)11.43%17.55%
Sharpe Ratio-0.151.15
Daily Std Dev42.64%34.08%
Max Drawdown-89.29%-97.48%
Current Drawdown-38.03%-2.12%

Fundamentals


SLABCRUS
Market Cap$3.98B$5.72B
EPS-$3.30$4.90
PE Ratio70.5721.66
PEG Ratio3.038.09
Revenue (TTM)$641.85M$1.79B
Gross Profit (TTM)$642.56M$923.64M
EBITDA (TTM)-$41.01M$393.80M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between SLAB and CRUS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SLAB vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SLAB achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than CRUS's 32.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SLAB has underperformed CRUS with an annualized return of 11.43%, while CRUS has yielded a comparatively higher 17.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
87.66%
427.04%
SLAB
CRUS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Silicon Laboratories Inc.

Cirrus Logic, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLAB vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLAB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLAB, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLAB, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLAB, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.01
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLAB, currently valued at -0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLAB, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.27
CRUS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 2.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.01
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.99
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 4.45, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.004.45

SLAB vs. CRUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the CRUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of SLAB and CRUS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.15
1.15
SLAB
CRUS

Dividends

SLAB vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLAB nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SLAB vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLAB drawdown since its inception was -89.29%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLAB and CRUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-38.03%
-2.12%
SLAB
CRUS

Volatility

SLAB vs. CRUS - Volatility Comparison

Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) have volatilities of 14.03% and 14.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.03%
14.21%
SLAB
CRUS

Financials

SLAB vs. CRUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Laboratories Inc. and Cirrus Logic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items