SKYW vs. FNGU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SKYW (SkyWest, Inc.) is a stock, while FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Over the past year, SKYW returned -17.19% vs 52.63% for FNGU. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SKYW vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKYW achieves a -16.99% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 27.32% return.

SKYW

• 1D: 2.66%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: -16.99%
• 6M: -18.39%
• 1Y: -17.19%
• 3Y*: 35.87%
• 5Y*: 11.66%
• 10Y*: 13.77%

FNGU

• 1D: -6.51%
• 1M: 22.14%
• YTD: 27.32%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 52.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKYW vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SKYW SkyWest, Inc.	-16.99%	-0.59%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	27.32%	4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SKYW and FNGU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.38

The correlation between SKYW and FNGU shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SKYW vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKYW

SKYW Risk / Return Rank: 22
SKYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SKYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SKYW Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SKYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SKYW Martin Ratio Rank: 24

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 25
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKYW vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SKYW	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	0.91	-1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.48	1.49	-1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.18	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	0.89	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.89	2.15	-3.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SKYW vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKYW Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKYW and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SKYW	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	0.91	-1.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.31	-0.07

Drawdowns

SKYW vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKYW drawdown since its inception was -81.77%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYW and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SKYW	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.77%	-60.84%	-20.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.63%	-59.55%	+22.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.63%	-11.04%	-21.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-22.03%	-13.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.31%	24.58%	-5.27%

Volatility

SKYW vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) is 12.09%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 18.24%. This indicates that SKYW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SKYW	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.09%	18.24%	-6.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.06%	45.27%	-18.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.42%	57.86%	-21.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.55%	78.70%	-35.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.45%	78.70%	-27.25%

Dividends

SKYW vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SKYW nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SKYW SkyWest, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.35%	0.74%	0.90%	0.60%	0.52%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SKYW and FNGU in my portfolio?

SKYW and FNGU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SKYW or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (18.24%) compared to SKYW (12.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYW dropped -81.77% vs FNGU's -60.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.