SKYT vs. GFS
SKYT (SkyWater Technology, Inc.) and GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, SKYT returned 54.67%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for GFS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SKYT vs. GFS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKYT achieves a 111.29% return, which is significantly lower than GFS's 146.25% return.
SKYT
- 1D
- -3.86%
- 1M
- 19.20%
- YTD
- 111.29%
- 6M
- 109.67%
- 1Y
- 331.61%
- 3Y*
- 54.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- —
GFS
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 26.92%
- YTD
- 146.25%
- 6M
- 125.75%
- 1Y
- 133.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SKYT vs. GFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYT SkyWater Technology, Inc. | 111.29% | 31.59% | 43.45% | 35.30% | -56.17% | -49.39% |
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 146.25% | -18.62% | -29.19% | 12.45% | -17.05% | 40.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKYT and GFS is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | 0.47 |
Fundamentals
SKYT:
$1.87B
GFS:
$48.24B
SKYT:
$2.35
GFS:
$1.39
SKYT:
16.35
GFS:
61.84
SKYT:
3.44
GFS:
7.03
SKYT:
10.38
GFS:
4.13
SKYT:
$541.53M
GFS:
$6.84B
SKYT:
$106.23M
GFS:
$1.81B
SKYT:
$138.71M
GFS:
$2.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKYT vs. GFS — Risk / Return Rank
SKYT
GFS
SKYT vs. GFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKYT | GFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.40 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.84 | 5.56 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.72 | 10.84 | +9.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKYT | GFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44 | 2.56 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.28 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
SKYT vs. GFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKYT drawdown since its inception was -86.72%, which is greater than GFS's maximum drawdown of -61.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYT and GFS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKYT | GFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.72% | -61.53% | -25.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.64% | -24.10% | -18.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.57% | -55.40% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.86% | -4.41% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -34.65% | -25.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.10% | 12.33% | +3.77% |
Volatility
SKYT vs. GFS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) is 11.95%, while GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a volatility of 24.59%. This indicates that SKYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKYT | GFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | 24.59% | -12.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.91% | 43.16% | +4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.23% | 52.38% | +44.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.79% | 50.94% | +45.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.41% | 50.94% | +46.47% |
Dividends
SKYT vs. GFS - Dividend Comparison
Neither SKYT nor GFS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SKYT vs. GFS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SkyWater Technology, Inc. and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SKYT vs. GFS - Profitability Comparison
SKYT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.15M and revenue of 160.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
GFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
SKYT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.28M and revenue of 160.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.3%.
GFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.
SKYT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported a net income of -12.31M and revenue of 160.69M, resulting in a net margin of -7.7%.
GFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SKYT and GFS have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFS has higher volatility (24.59%) compared to SKYT (11.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYT dropped -86.72% vs GFS's -61.53%.
SKYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKYT and GFS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer