SKGR vs. HOOD

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SKGR (SK Growth Opportunities Corporation) and HOOD (Robinhood Markets, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — SKGR in Shell Companies, HOOD in Capital Markets. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

SKGR vs. HOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SK Growth Opportunities Corporation (SKGR) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SKGR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOD

• 1D: -6.63%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: -27.08%
• 6M: -37.50%
• 1Y: 13.74%
• 3Y*: 108.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKGR vs. HOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SKGR SK Growth Opportunities Corporation	0.00%	3.40%	7.44%	6.29%	2.62%
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc.	-27.08%	203.54%	192.46%	56.51%	-19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SKGR and HOOD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022	-0.01

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) SKGR : $0.00 HOOD : $3.91B
Gross Profit (TTM) SKGR : $0.00 HOOD : $2.86B
EBITDA (TTM) SKGR : -$546.46K HOOD : $1.80B

Return for Risk

SKGR vs. HOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOD

HOOD Risk / Return Rank: 48
HOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
HOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
HOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 48
HOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
HOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKGR vs. HOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SK Growth Opportunities Corporation (SKGR) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SKGR	HOOD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.26	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SKGR	HOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-90.21%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-57.26%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-57.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-45.91%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-60.96%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	31.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SKGR	HOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	50.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	69.04%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	74.06%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	74.06%	—

Dividends

SKGR vs. HOOD - Dividend Comparison

Neither SKGR nor HOOD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SKGR and HOOD in my portfolio?

SKGR and HOOD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.