PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJNK vs. FTSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SJNK vs. FTSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJNK achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than FTSL's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SJNK has outperformed FTSL with an annualized return of 5.51%, while FTSL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.45% annualized return.


SJNK

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.87%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
4.84%
10Y*
5.51%

FTSL

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.99%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
4.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJNK vs. FTSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SJNK
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
1.41%7.68%8.24%11.63%-5.50%5.06%5.82%9.49%-0.27%5.27%
FTSL
First Trust Senior Loan Fund
0.62%5.98%8.27%11.58%-2.50%3.94%2.99%10.11%-1.30%2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SJNK and FTSL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2013

0.43

The correlation between SJNK and FTSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SJNK vs. FTSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SJNK
FTSL

Communication Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

SJNK
100.0%
FTSL

-

Basic Materials

SJNK

-

FTSL
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SJNK

-

FTSL

-

Consumer Defensive

SJNK

-

FTSL

-

Energy

SJNK

-

FTSL

-

Financial Services

SJNK

-

FTSL

-

Healthcare

SJNK

-

FTSL

-

Industrials

SJNK

-

FTSL

-

Real Estate

SJNK

-

FTSL

-

Technology

SJNK

-

FTSL

-

Utilities

SJNK

-

FTSL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJNK vs. FTSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJNK
SJNK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SJNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SJNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJNK Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FTSL
FTSL Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FTSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSL Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJNK vs. FTSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SJNKFTSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

2.15

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

3.35

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.51

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

1.95

+1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.21

7.25

+8.96

SJNK vs. FTSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJNK Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the FTSL Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJNK and FTSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SJNKFTSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.15

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

1.50

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.86

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.85

-0.05

Drawdowns

SJNK vs. FTSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJNK drawdown since its inception was -19.74%, smaller than the maximum FTSL drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJNK and FTSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJNKFTSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.74%

-22.67%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-2.33%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.77%

-2.66%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.18%

-6.96%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.74%

-22.67%

+2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.03%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-0.76%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.63%

-0.23%

Volatility

SJNK vs. FTSL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) at 0.36%. This indicates that SJNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJNKFTSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.36%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

1.95%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

2.11%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

3.35%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.49%

5.19%

+1.30%

SJNK vs. FTSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSL's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

SJNK vs. FTSL - Dividend Comparison

SJNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than FTSL's 6.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSL
First Trust Senior Loan Fund
6.46%6.59%7.56%7.59%4.77%3.17%3.48%4.44%4.29%3.64%3.70%3.95%
SJNK
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
7.02%7.12%7.47%7.20%5.85%4.21%5.34%5.64%5.69%5.64%5.65%5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


SJNK and FTSL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SJNK has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to FTSL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJNK dropped -19.74% vs FTSL's -22.67%.

On 10-year performance, SJNK leads with 5.51% vs 4.45% for FTSL. On fees, SJNK is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FTSL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SJNK has performed better with a 5.51% return vs 4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SJNK is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FTSL.

SJNK has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 6.46% for FTSL.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SJNK and 0.86% for FTSL.

FTSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJNK and FTSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer