SIVR vs. PLTM
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM).
SIVR and PLTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. PLTM is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. Both SIVR and PLTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SIVR or PLTM.
Key characteristics
| SIVR | PLTM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.15% | -7.76% |
| 1Y Return | 9.94% | -16.27% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.21% | -10.14% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.43% | -0.07% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.37 | -0.73 |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.05% | 22.67% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.85% | -42.32% |
| Current Drawdown | -45.60% | -29.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and PLTM is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SIVR vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than PLTM's -7.76% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIVR vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SIVR vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SIVR vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor PLTM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and PLTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SIVR vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 9.62% compared to GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) at 6.84%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.