SIVR vs. PLTM
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIVR returned 21.00%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for PLTM. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.
Performance
SIVR vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly higher than PLTM's -9.33% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 24.90%
- 1Y
- 110.95%
- 3Y*
- 45.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
PLTM
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- -9.33%
- 6M
- 11.67%
- 1Y
- 71.85%
- 3Y*
- 22.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 2.85% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -7.62% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -9.33% | 124.46% | -8.91% | -8.10% | 10.83% | -10.52% | 10.87% | 20.76% | -20.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and PLTM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SIVR and PLTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
PLTM
SIVR vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIVR | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 2.09 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 4.43 | +1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIVR | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.41 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.28 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.24 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and PLTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -42.32% | -33.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.42% | -34.52% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.42% | -34.52% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.42% | -34.52% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.25% | -33.02% | -4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.85% | -18.55% | -29.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.64% | 16.28% | +3.36% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.28% compared to GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) at 10.88%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.28% | 10.88% | +5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.30% | 45.45% | +12.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.84% | 51.40% | +7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.17% | 32.83% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.87% | 30.98% | +0.89% |
SIVR vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor PLTM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and PLTM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to PLTM (10.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs PLTM's -42.32%.
On 5-year performance, SIVR leads with 21.00% vs 9.22% for PLTM. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PLTM has been the lower-risk option at 10.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PLTM.
SIVR and PLTM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while PLTM is Precious Metals. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while PLTM tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: abrdn and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.50% for PLTM.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and PLTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer