PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SIVR vs. PICK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SIVRPICK
YTD Return31.09%-3.70%
1Y Return37.94%12.36%
3Y Return (Ann)8.40%4.77%
5Y Return (Ann)12.91%12.41%
10Y Return (Ann)6.78%6.50%
Sharpe Ratio1.220.54
Sortino Ratio1.810.89
Omega Ratio1.221.11
Calmar Ratio0.680.54
Martin Ratio5.191.33
Ulcer Index7.38%9.06%
Daily Std Dev31.31%22.38%
Max Drawdown-75.85%-68.88%
Current Drawdown-38.07%-12.44%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between SIVR and PICK is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SIVR vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 31.09% return, which is significantly higher than PICK's -3.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SIVR having a 6.78% annualized return and PICK not far behind at 6.50%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.67%
-5.65%
SIVR
PICK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIVR vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.


PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Expense ratio chart for PICK: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for SIVR: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SIVR vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIVR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SIVR, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SIVR, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SIVR, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SIVR, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.90
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SIVR, currently valued at 5.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.005.19
PICK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PICK, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PICK, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PICK, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PICK, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.54
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PICK, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.33

SIVR vs. PICK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the PICK Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and PICK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.22
0.54
SIVR
PICK

Dividends

SIVR vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SIVR
Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
3.72%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%2.88%3.39%

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than PICK's maximum drawdown of -68.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and PICK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-18.46%
-12.44%
SIVR
PICK

Volatility

SIVR vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 6.90%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.71%
6.90%
SIVR
PICK