SIVR vs. PICK
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK).
SIVR and PICK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. PICK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both SIVR and PICK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SIVR or PICK.
Key characteristics
| SIVR | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.15% | -0.98% |
| 1Y Return | 9.94% | 9.96% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.21% | 2.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.43% | 11.94% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.11% | 5.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.37 | 0.48 |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.05% | 21.72% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.85% | -68.88% |
| Current Drawdown | -45.60% | -9.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and PICK is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SIVR vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than PICK's -0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has underperformed PICK with an annualized return of 3.11%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively higher 5.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIVR vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SIVR vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SIVR vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 4.23% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.50% | 4.76% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.73% | 2.88% | 3.38% |
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than PICK's maximum drawdown of -68.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and PICK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SIVR vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 9.62% compared to iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 4.51%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.