SIVR vs. PALL
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL).
SIVR and PALL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. PALL is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010. Both SIVR and PALL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SIVR or PALL.
Key characteristics
| SIVR | PALL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.15% | -10.68% |
| 1Y Return | 9.94% | -35.53% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.21% | -30.92% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.43% | -8.23% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.11% | 1.45% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.37 | -0.97 |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.05% | 35.41% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.85% | -73.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -45.60% | -69.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and PALL is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SIVR vs. PALL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than PALL's -10.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed PALL with an annualized return of 3.11%, while PALL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIVR vs. PALL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PALL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SIVR vs. PALL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SIVR vs. PALL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor PALL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. PALL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, roughly equal to the maximum PALL drawdown of -73.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and PALL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SIVR vs. PALL - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) have volatilities of 9.62% and 9.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.