SIVR vs. BCD
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD).
SIVR and BCD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. BCD is an actively managed fund by Abrdn Plc. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SIVR or BCD.
Key characteristics
| SIVR | BCD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 31.09% | 5.43% |
| 1Y Return | 37.94% | 3.46% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.40% | 4.59% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.91% | 10.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.22 | 0.25 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.81 | 0.43 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.22 | 1.05 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.68 | 0.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.19 | 0.62 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.38% | 5.02% |
| Daily Std Dev | 31.31% | 12.54% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.85% | -29.79% |
| Current Drawdown | -38.07% | -16.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and BCD is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SIVR vs. BCD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 31.09% return, which is significantly higher than BCD's 5.43% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIVR vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SIVR vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SIVR vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 4.28% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.56% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than BCD's maximum drawdown of -29.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and BCD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SIVR vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) at 3.47%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.