SITE vs. STZ
SITE (SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.) and STZ (Constellation Brands, Inc.) are both stocks. SITE operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while STZ operates in Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, SITE returned 12.22%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for STZ. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SITE vs. STZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SITE achieves a -14.37% return, which is significantly lower than STZ's 3.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SITE has outperformed STZ with an annualized return of 12.22%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively lower 0.82% annualized return.
SITE
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -14.37%
- 6M
- -16.65%
- 1Y
- -8.51%
- 3Y*
- -12.25%
- 5Y*
- -9.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
STZ
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- -10.50%
- 3Y*
- -14.70%
- 5Y*
- -7.16%
- 10Y*
- 0.82%
SITE vs. STZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SITE SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. | -14.37% | -5.47% | -18.91% | 38.51% | -51.58% | 52.73% | 74.99% | 64.01% | -27.94% | 120.85% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 3.93% | -35.99% | -7.11% | 5.83% | -6.43% | 16.12% | 17.41% | 19.85% | -28.73% | 50.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SITE and STZ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2016 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
SITE:
$4.76B
STZ:
$24.58B
SITE:
$3.40
STZ:
$11.23
SITE:
31.38
STZ:
12.60
SITE:
1.02
STZ:
2.71
SITE:
2.93
STZ:
2.93
SITE:
$4.71B
STZ:
$9.14B
SITE:
$1.64B
STZ:
$4.71B
SITE:
$327.37M
STZ:
$3.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SITE vs. STZ — Risk / Return Rank
SITE
STZ
SITE vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SITE | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.96 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | -0.40 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | -0.69 | +0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SITE vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SITE drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, smaller than the maximum STZ drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SITE and STZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SITE | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.96% | -67.39% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.49% | -26.51% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.08% | -51.28% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.96% | -51.28% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.96% | -53.53% | -6.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.62% | -45.28% | -12.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.93% | -16.61% | -9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.98% | 15.17% | +1.81% |
Volatility
SITE vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 8.40%. This indicates that SITE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SITE | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.92% | 8.40% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.35% | 23.55% | +8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.58% | 30.36% | +11.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.76% | 24.57% | +16.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.86% | 26.99% | +14.87% |
Dividends
SITE vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison
SITE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SITE SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2.89% | 2.95% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
Financials
SITE vs. STZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SITE vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison
SITE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. reported a gross profit of 318.80M and revenue of 940.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
STZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 941.60M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
SITE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. reported an operating income of -31.10M and revenue of 940.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.3%.
STZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 357.10M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
SITE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. reported a net income of -26.60M and revenue of 940.10M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
STZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 477.70M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SITE and STZ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SITE has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to STZ (8.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SITE dropped -59.96% vs STZ's -67.39%.
SITE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SITE and STZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer