PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SIMO vs. LSCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SIMO and LSCC is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

SIMO vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-8.42%
39.46%
SIMO
LSCC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SIMO:

-0.29

LSCC:

-0.15

Sortino Ratio

SIMO:

-0.16

LSCC:

0.16

Omega Ratio

SIMO:

0.98

LSCC:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

SIMO:

-0.26

LSCC:

-0.13

Martin Ratio

SIMO:

-0.46

LSCC:

-0.25

Ulcer Index

SIMO:

24.52%

LSCC:

30.27%

Daily Std Dev

SIMO:

38.80%

LSCC:

52.87%

Max Drawdown

SIMO:

-93.20%

LSCC:

-97.34%

Current Drawdown

SIMO:

-34.23%

LSCC:

-29.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SIMO:

$1.98B

LSCC:

$9.48B

EPS

SIMO:

$2.69

LSCC:

$0.44

PE Ratio

SIMO:

21.88

LSCC:

156.32

PEG Ratio

SIMO:

-4.43

LSCC:

3.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

SIMO:

$826.92M

LSCC:

$509.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SIMO:

$385.14M

LSCC:

$322.02M

EBITDA (TTM)

SIMO:

$133.72M

LSCC:

$90.11M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than LSCC's 21.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 9.65%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 27.01% annualized return.


SIMO

YTD

9.93%

1M

14.35%

6M

-8.42%

1Y

-9.57%

5Y*

7.54%

10Y*

9.65%

LSCC

YTD

21.41%

1M

17.94%

6M

39.46%

1Y

-4.70%

5Y*

29.43%

10Y*

27.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SIMO vs. LSCC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SIMO is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SIMO is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SIMO is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SIMO is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SIMO is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SIMO is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

LSCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LSCC is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LSCC is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LSCC is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LSCC is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LSCC is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LSCC is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SIMO vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SIMO, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.29-0.15
The chart of Sortino ratio for SIMO, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.160.16
The chart of Omega ratio for SIMO, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.981.02
The chart of Calmar ratio for SIMO, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.26-0.13
The chart of Martin ratio for SIMO, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.46-0.25
SIMO
LSCC

The current SIMO Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the LSCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMO and LSCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.29
-0.15
SIMO
LSCC

Dividends

SIMO vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison

SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, while LSCC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
3.40%3.70%0.82%2.31%1.63%2.91%2.46%3.48%1.70%1.53%1.91%2.54%
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SIMO vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.20%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and LSCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-34.23%
-29.28%
SIMO
LSCC

Volatility

SIMO vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) have volatilities of 13.47% and 13.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
13.47%
13.70%
SIMO
LSCC

Financials

SIMO vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab