PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SIMO vs. LSCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SIMOLSCC
YTD Return19.14%-4.22%
1Y Return16.11%-26.90%
3Y Return (Ann)3.76%6.45%
5Y Return (Ann)15.17%37.74%
10Y Return (Ann)18.40%22.49%
Sharpe Ratio0.30-0.57
Daily Std Dev47.64%47.71%
Max Drawdown-93.19%-97.34%
Current Drawdown-21.73%-32.06%

Fundamentals


SIMOLSCC
Market Cap$2.40B$9.15B
EPS$1.58$1.85
PE Ratio45.4735.95
PEG Ratio-4.433.18
Revenue (TTM)$639.14M$737.15M
Gross Profit (TTM)$473.89M$452.05M
EBITDA (TTM)$67.00M$248.61M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between SIMO and LSCC is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SIMO vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a 19.14% return, which is significantly higher than LSCC's -4.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 18.40%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 22.49% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
819.92%
1,388.29%
SIMO
LSCC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SIMO vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIMO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SIMO, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SIMO, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SIMO, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SIMO, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SIMO, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.64
LSCC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.57
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LSCC, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.93
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.62
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -1.19, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.19

SIMO vs. LSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the LSCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of SIMO and LSCC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.30
-0.57
SIMO
LSCC

Dividends

SIMO vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison

SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while LSCC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
1.38%0.82%2.31%1.63%2.91%2.46%3.48%1.70%1.53%1.91%2.54%4.24%
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SIMO vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and LSCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-21.73%
-32.06%
SIMO
LSCC

Volatility

SIMO vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) is 8.33%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that SIMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
8.33%
11.11%
SIMO
LSCC

Financials

SIMO vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items