PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIMO vs. LSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SIMO vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a 232.65% return, which is significantly higher than LSCC's 110.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 24.12%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 38.58% annualized return.


SIMO

1D
1.76%
1M
35.23%
YTD
232.65%
6M
239.06%
1Y
380.38%
3Y*
72.55%
5Y*
38.76%
10Y*
24.12%

LSCC

1D
2.15%
1M
23.12%
YTD
110.11%
6M
105.78%
1Y
232.26%
3Y*
24.79%
5Y*
23.81%
10Y*
38.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIMO vs. LSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
232.65%76.91%-8.94%-4.91%-30.38%101.83%-1.81%51.81%-33.11%27.14%
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
110.11%29.89%-17.89%6.33%-15.81%68.18%139.39%176.59%19.72%-21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SIMO and LSCC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2005

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SIMO:

$2.60B

LSCC:

$21.55B

EPS

SIMO:

$17.93

LSCC:

$0.14

PE Ratio

SIMO:

17.10

LSCC:

1.07K

PS Ratio

SIMO:

2.59

LSCC:

37.16

PB Ratio

SIMO:

2.87

LSCC:

29.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

SIMO:

$997.60M

LSCC:

$574.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SIMO:

$485.91M

LSCC:

$383.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

SIMO:

$146.89M

LSCC:

$65.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIMO vs. LSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMO
SIMO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SIMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIMO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SIMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIMO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LSCC
LSCC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIMO vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIMOLSCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.58

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.60

12.10

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.64

36.01

+8.64

SIMO vs. LSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIMO Sharpe Ratio is 5.61, which is comparable to the LSCC Sharpe Ratio of 4.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMO and LSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIMOLSCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.61

4.41

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.44

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.77

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.23

+0.13

Drawdowns

SIMO vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and LSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIMOLSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.19%

-97.34%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.26%

-19.33%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.84%

-61.09%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.49%

-61.09%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.49%

-61.09%

+4.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.39%

-55.16%

+22.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.57%

6.48%

+2.09%

Volatility

SIMO vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) has a higher volatility of 19.24% compared to Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) at 16.53%. This indicates that SIMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIMOLSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.24%

16.53%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.53%

40.54%

+14.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.33%

53.16%

+15.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.87%

53.94%

-4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.97%

50.46%

-5.49%

Dividends

SIMO vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison

SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while LSCC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
0.65%2.16%3.70%0.82%2.31%1.62%2.89%2.45%3.45%1.68%1.51%1.88%

Financials

SIMO vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
278.46M
170.90M
(SIMO) Total Revenue
(LSCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SIMO vs. LSCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%20222023202420252026
49.1%
68.8%
Portfolio components
SIMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 136.77M and revenue of 278.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

LSCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 117.63M and revenue of 170.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.

SIMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 31.71M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

LSCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 26.07M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

SIMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 47.75M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.

LSCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 21.82M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SIMO and LSCC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIMO has higher volatility (19.24%) compared to LSCC (16.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMO dropped -93.19% vs LSCC's -97.34%.

SIMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 4.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIMO and LSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer