SIMO vs. LSCC
Compare and contrast key facts about Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC).
Performance
SIMO vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIMO vs. LSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 26.67% | 76.91% | -8.94% | -4.91% | -30.38% | 101.83% | -1.81% | 51.81% | -33.11% | 27.14% |
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 29.85% | 29.89% | -17.89% | 6.33% | -15.81% | 68.18% | 139.39% | 176.59% | 19.72% | -21.47% |
Fundamentals
SIMO:
$21.91
LSCC:
$0.02
SIMO:
5.34
LSCC:
4.26K
SIMO:
0.74
LSCC:
25.10
SIMO:
$885.63M
LSCC:
$523.26M
SIMO:
$427.51M
LSCC:
$356.94M
SIMO:
$123.21M
LSCC:
$45.55M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a 26.67% return, which is significantly lower than LSCC's 29.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 14.53%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 32.82% annualized return.
SIMO
- 1D
- 4.18%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- 26.67%
- 6M
- 21.39%
- 1Y
- 135.36%
- 3Y*
- 24.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.53%
LSCC
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- 29.85%
- 6M
- 29.81%
- 1Y
- 80.54%
- 3Y*
- 0.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- 32.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIMO vs. LSCC — Risk / Return Rank
SIMO
LSCC
SIMO vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIMO | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 1.29 | +1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 2.02 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.27 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 2.88 | +2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.23 | 8.64 | +5.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIMO | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.29 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.27 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.65 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.20 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIMO and LSCC is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SIMO vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison
SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while LSCC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 1.71% | 2.16% | 3.70% | 0.82% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.89% | 2.45% | 3.45% | 1.68% | 1.51% | 1.88% |
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SIMO vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and LSCC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIMO | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -97.34% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.26% | -26.12% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.49% | -61.09% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.49% | -61.09% | +4.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.20% | -9.67% | -8.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.62% | -55.42% | +22.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.66% | 9.51% | +0.15% |
Volatility
SIMO vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) is 14.71%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 21.04%. This indicates that SIMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIMO | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.71% | 21.04% | -6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.80% | 40.44% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.64% | 62.56% | -9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.72% | 53.83% | -9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 50.61% | -8.54% |
Financials
SIMO vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SIMO vs. LSCC - Profitability Comparison
SIMO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 136.77M and revenue of 278.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
LSCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 99.94M and revenue of 145.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.6%.
SIMO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 31.71M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.
LSCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 1.09M and revenue of 145.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
SIMO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 47.75M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
LSCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of -7.65M and revenue of 145.79M, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.