PortfoliosLab logo
SIMO vs. LSCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SIMO and LSCC is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SIMO vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
599.65%
1,007.66%
SIMO
LSCC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SIMO:

-0.65

LSCC:

-0.47

Sortino Ratio

SIMO:

-0.70

LSCC:

-0.40

Omega Ratio

SIMO:

0.91

LSCC:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

SIMO:

-0.53

LSCC:

-0.51

Martin Ratio

SIMO:

-0.97

LSCC:

-1.04

Ulcer Index

SIMO:

30.76%

LSCC:

29.78%

Daily Std Dev

SIMO:

46.90%

LSCC:

62.66%

Max Drawdown

SIMO:

-93.19%

LSCC:

-97.34%

Current Drawdown

SIMO:

-40.47%

LSCC:

-49.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SIMO:

$1.80B

LSCC:

$7.22B

EPS

SIMO:

$3.09

LSCC:

$0.44

PE Ratio

SIMO:

17.32

LSCC:

119.23

PEG Ratio

SIMO:

-4.43

LSCC:

3.18

PS Ratio

SIMO:

2.29

LSCC:

14.02

PB Ratio

SIMO:

2.33

LSCC:

10.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

SIMO:

$783.52M

LSCC:

$488.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SIMO:

$367.08M

LSCC:

$316.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

SIMO:

$108.05M

LSCC:

$66.92M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly higher than LSCC's -13.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 8.14%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 23.05% annualized return.


SIMO

YTD

-0.49%

1M

36.74%

6M

-3.19%

1Y

-30.42%

5Y*

6.15%

10Y*

8.14%

LSCC

YTD

-13.19%

1M

29.97%

6M

-10.66%

1Y

-29.09%

5Y*

16.01%

10Y*

23.05%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SIMO vs. LSCC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SIMO is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SIMO is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SIMO is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SIMO is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SIMO is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SIMO is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LSCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LSCC is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LSCC is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LSCC is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LSCC is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LSCC is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LSCC is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SIMO vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SIMO Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the LSCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMO and LSCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.20-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.20December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.65
-0.47
SIMO
LSCC

Dividends

SIMO vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison

SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, while LSCC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
3.79%3.70%0.82%2.31%1.63%2.91%2.46%3.48%1.70%1.53%1.91%2.54%
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SIMO vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and LSCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-40.47%
-49.43%
SIMO
LSCC

Volatility

SIMO vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) is 17.72%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 28.86%. This indicates that SIMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
17.72%
28.86%
SIMO
LSCC

Financials

SIMO vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20212022202320242025
166.49M
120.15M
(SIMO) Total Revenue
(LSCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SIMO vs. LSCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%20212022202320242025
47.1%
68.0%
(SIMO) Gross Margin
(LSCC) Gross Margin
SIMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 78.37M and revenue of 166.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.1%.

LSCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 81.73M and revenue of 120.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.0%.

SIMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 9.77M and revenue of 166.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

LSCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 6.97M and revenue of 120.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

SIMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 19.46M and revenue of 166.49M, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

LSCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 5.02M and revenue of 120.15M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.