SIMO vs. LSCC
Compare and contrast key facts about Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SIMO or LSCC.
Key characteristics
| SIMO | LSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.63% | -21.47% |
| 1Y Return | 7.45% | -36.27% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.52% | 0.51% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.66% | 26.64% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.18% | 22.58% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.78 | -0.81 |
| Daily Std Dev | 44.45% | 48.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -93.19% | -97.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -25.35% | -44.29% |
Fundamentals
| SIMO | LSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.50B | $7.86B |
| EPS | $1.77 | $1.56 |
| PE Ratio | 41.95 | 36.65 |
| PEG Ratio | -4.43 | 3.18 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $582.50M | $503.58M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $252.56M | $331.43M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $74.41M | $149.12M |
Correlation
The correlation between SIMO and LSCC is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SIMO vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than LSCC's -21.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 14.18%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 22.58% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SIMO vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SIMO vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison
SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, while LSCC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 2.18% | 0.82% | 2.31% | 1.63% | 2.91% | 2.46% | 3.48% | 1.70% | 1.53% | 1.91% | 2.54% | 4.24% |
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SIMO vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and LSCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SIMO vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) is 11.10%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 14.89%. This indicates that SIMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SIMO vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities