SIMO vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SIMO or COST.
Correlation
The correlation between SIMO and COST is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SIMO vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SIMO:
-0.12
COST:
2.60
SIMO:
0.09
COST:
3.20
SIMO:
1.01
COST:
1.46
SIMO:
-0.10
COST:
4.72
SIMO:
-0.21
COST:
12.17
SIMO:
20.39%
COST:
3.98%
SIMO:
36.75%
COST:
18.66%
SIMO:
-93.20%
COST:
-53.39%
SIMO:
-40.34%
COST:
-4.08%
Fundamentals
SIMO:
$2.03B
COST:
$435.99B
SIMO:
$2.66
COST:
$16.98
SIMO:
22.61
COST:
57.84
SIMO:
-4.43
COST:
5.99
SIMO:
$824.93M
COST:
$258.81B
SIMO:
$380.52M
COST:
$32.80B
SIMO:
$132.09M
COST:
$12.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 45.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 11.12%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.42% annualized return.
SIMO
-9.19%
-1.64%
-33.46%
-8.32%
4.01%
11.12%
COST
45.38%
2.80%
12.78%
47.55%
28.68%
23.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SIMO vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SIMO vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than COST's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 3.71% | 0.82% | 2.31% | 1.63% | 2.91% | 2.46% | 3.48% | 1.70% | 1.53% | 1.91% | 2.54% | 4.24% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.04% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
SIMO vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.20%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SIMO vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.84%. This indicates that SIMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SIMO vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities