PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SIMO vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SIMO and COST is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

SIMO vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-32.91%
10.33%
SIMO
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SIMO:

-0.51

COST:

1.91

Sortino Ratio

SIMO:

-0.51

COST:

2.47

Omega Ratio

SIMO:

0.94

COST:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

SIMO:

-0.43

COST:

3.50

Martin Ratio

SIMO:

-0.85

COST:

8.37

Ulcer Index

SIMO:

22.09%

COST:

4.29%

Daily Std Dev

SIMO:

36.78%

COST:

18.78%

Max Drawdown

SIMO:

-93.20%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

SIMO:

-44.07%

COST:

-7.16%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SIMO:

$1.70B

COST:

$409.94B

EPS

SIMO:

$2.66

COST:

$16.99

PE Ratio

SIMO:

19.00

COST:

54.36

PEG Ratio

SIMO:

-4.43

COST:

5.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

SIMO:

$636.80M

COST:

$258.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SIMO:

$295.93M

COST:

$32.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

SIMO:

$106.64M

COST:

$12.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 10.28%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.42% annualized return.


SIMO

YTD

-6.51%

1M

-16.23%

6M

-31.85%

1Y

-17.95%

5Y*

2.50%

10Y*

10.28%

COST

YTD

0.79%

1M

-6.99%

6M

9.43%

1Y

36.30%

5Y*

27.08%

10Y*

23.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SIMO vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SIMO is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SIMO is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SIMO is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SIMO is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SIMO is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SIMO is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SIMO vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SIMO, currently valued at -0.51, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.511.91
The chart of Sortino ratio for SIMO, currently valued at -0.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.512.47
The chart of Omega ratio for SIMO, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.941.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for SIMO, currently valued at -0.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.433.50
The chart of Martin ratio for SIMO, currently valued at -0.85, compared to the broader market-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.858.37
SIMO
COST

The current SIMO Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMO and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.51
1.91
SIMO
COST

Dividends

SIMO vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than COST's 0.49% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
3.96%3.70%0.82%2.31%1.63%2.91%2.46%3.48%1.70%1.53%1.91%2.54%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.49%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

SIMO vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.20%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-44.07%
-7.16%
SIMO
COST

Volatility

SIMO vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) has a higher volatility of 13.81% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.27%. This indicates that SIMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
13.81%
4.27%
SIMO
COST

Financials

SIMO vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab