SILV vs. FSM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SilverCrest Metals Inc (SILV) and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM).

Performance

SILV vs. FSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SilverCrest Metals Inc (SILV) and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SILV vs. FSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SILV SilverCrest Metals Inc	0.00%	26.92%	38.93%	9.17%	-24.15%	-29.25%	65.88%	130.03%	106.34%	-19.69%
FSM Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.	1.22%	128.67%	11.14%	2.93%	-3.85%	-52.67%	101.96%	12.09%	-30.27%	-7.61%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) SILV : $279.47M FSM : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) SILV : $162.86M FSM : $502.09M
EBITDA (TTM) SILV : $167.82M FSM : $670.30M

Returns By Period

SILV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSM

• 1D: 6.09%
• 1M: -27.31%
• YTD: 1.22%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: 62.79%
• 3Y*: 37.50%
• 5Y*: 8.03%
• 10Y*: 9.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SILV vs. FSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSM

FSM Risk / Return Rank: 74
FSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FSM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FSM Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILV vs. FSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SilverCrest Metals Inc (SILV) and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SILV	FSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.14	—

Correlation

The correlation between SILV and FSM is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SILV vs. FSM - Dividend Comparison

Neither SILV nor FSM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SILV	FSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-92.25%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-37.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-73.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-27.31%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-45.35%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	11.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SILV	FSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	60.84%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	57.92%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	60.09%	—

Financials