SILO vs. MUB
SILO (Silo Pharma Inc) is a stock, while MUB (iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. Over the past 5 years, SILO returned -48.72%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MUB. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SILO vs. MUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILO achieves a -17.84% return, which is significantly lower than MUB's 0.21% return.
SILO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -32.20%
- 6M
- -19.06%
- YTD
- -17.84%
- 1Y
- -61.53%
- 3Y*
- -49.27%
- 5Y*
- -48.72%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -37.96%
MUB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 2.86%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $531.87M | $437.83M | $388.20M | |
SILO Silo Pharma Inc | $98.48K | $2.14M | $892.96K |
SILO vs. MUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILO Silo Pharma Inc | -17.84% | -61.80% | -38.19% | -57.14% | -53.01% | -66.31% | 21.26% | -65.00% | 344.44% |
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 0.21% | 3.78% | 1.26% | 5.56% | -7.34% | 1.02% | 5.12% | 7.06% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILO and MUB is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2018 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILO vs. MUB — Risk / Return Rank
SILO
MUB
SILO vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silo Pharma Inc (SILO) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SILO | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.34 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 1.80 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 5.86 | -7.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SILO vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILO drawdown since its inception was -99.44%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILO and MUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILO | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.44% | -13.68% | -85.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.74% | -2.79% | -62.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.95% | -4.78% | -87.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.75% | -11.78% | -85.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.44% | -1.79% | -97.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.49% | -2.22% | -85.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.42% | 0.86% | +45.56% |
Volatility
SILO vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison
Silo Pharma Inc (SILO) has a higher volatility of 40.88% compared to iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) at 0.96%. This indicates that SILO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILO | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.88% | 0.96% | +39.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 91.68% | 2.41% | +89.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 115.27% | 2.98% | +112.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 121.13% | 4.09% | +117.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.00% | 4.91% | +141.09% |
Dividends
SILO vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison
SILO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 2.96% | 3.14% | 3.01% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% |
SILO Silo Pharma Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SILO and MUB have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILO has higher volatility (40.88%) compared to MUB (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILO dropped -99.44% vs MUB's -13.68%.
MUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SILO and MUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer