SILO vs. MUB

In the year-to-date period, SILO achieves a -50.11% return, which is significantly lower than MUB's -1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SILO has underperformed MUB with an annualized return of -11.46%, while MUB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.98% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silo Pharma Inc (SILO) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SILO Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILO and MUB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SILO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%.

The maximum SILO drawdown since its inception was -99.17%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILO and MUB.

Silo Pharma Inc (SILO) has a higher volatility of 64.81% compared to iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) at 1.10%. This indicates that SILO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.