SIL vs. URA
SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIL returned 8.64%/yr vs 16.42%/yr for URA. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
SIL vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -5.97% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 8.64%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 16.42% annualized return.
SIL
- 1D
- -5.47%
- 1M
- -10.87%
- YTD
- -5.97%
- 6M
- -10.24%
- 1Y
- 65.33%
- 3Y*
- 47.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
URA
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 34.68%
- 5Y*
- 20.40%
- 10Y*
- 16.42%
SIL vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -5.97% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.67% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIL and URA is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010 | 0.44 |
The correlation between SIL and URA shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (10 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIL vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIL
URA
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SIL
URA
Consumer Defensive
SIL
URA
-
Communication Services
SIL
-
URA
-
Consumer Cyclical
SIL
-
URA
-
Energy
SIL
-
URA
Financial Services
SIL
-
URA
-
Healthcare
SIL
-
URA
-
Industrials
SIL
-
URA
Real Estate
SIL
-
URA
-
Technology
SIL
-
URA
Utilities
SIL
-
URA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIL vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
SIL
URA
SIL vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIL | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 0.87 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 1.87 | +2.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIL vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIL | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.99% | -93.54% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.08% | -31.48% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.08% | -37.81% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.48% | -37.90% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.04% | -61.45% | -1.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.47% | -48.27% | +14.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.37% | -74.90% | +23.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.58% | 14.58% | 0.00% |
Volatility
SIL vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 19.47% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 17.86%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIL | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.47% | 17.86% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.45% | 39.53% | +4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.59% | 51.33% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.84% | 43.92% | -4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.90% | 37.95% | +1.95% |
SIL vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIL vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than URA's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.26% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.57% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIL and URA have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (19.47%) compared to URA (17.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs URA's -93.54%.
On 10-year performance, URA leads with 16.42% vs 8.64% for SIL. On fees, SIL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, URA has been the lower-risk option at 17.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 16.42% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 1.26% for SIL.
SIL is categorized as Silver, while URA is Uranium. SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SIL and 0.69% for URA.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIL and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer