SIL vs. URA
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).
SIL and URA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIL is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Stuttgart Solactive AG Global Silver Miners (USD). It was launched on Apr 19, 2010. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. Both SIL and URA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SIL or URA.
Correlation
The correlation between SIL and URA is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SIL vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SIL:
0.81
URA:
-0.39
SIL:
1.31
URA:
-0.32
SIL:
1.16
URA:
0.96
SIL:
0.49
URA:
-0.20
SIL:
2.82
URA:
-0.92
SIL:
11.03%
URA:
17.00%
SIL:
38.43%
URA:
39.67%
SIL:
-82.99%
URA:
-93.54%
SIL:
-49.31%
URA:
-74.37%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a 26.66% return, which is significantly higher than URA's -11.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 5.98%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.10% annualized return.
SIL
26.66%
1.72%
1.93%
32.83%
6.72%
5.98%
URA
-11.65%
-6.81%
-23.03%
-16.79%
21.40%
3.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIL vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SIL vs. URA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SIL
URA
SIL vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SIL vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than URA's 3.24% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.90% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.22% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% | 0.08% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 3.24% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% |
Drawdowns
SIL vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and URA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SIL vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 15.29%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.