SIL vs. URA
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).
SIL and URA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIL is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. It was launched on Apr 19, 2010. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. Both SIL and URA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SIL vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIL vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 7.85% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 13.34% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 13.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 14.65%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 16.47% annualized return.
SIL
- 1D
- 7.82%
- 1M
- -23.68%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 27.11%
- 1Y
- 131.18%
- 3Y*
- 45.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.33%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
URA
- 1D
- 6.93%
- 1M
- -10.88%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 121.39%
- 3Y*
- 40.54%
- 5Y*
- 24.65%
- 10Y*
- 16.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIL vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIL vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
SIL
URA
SIL vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIL | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.65 | 2.48 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 2.97 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.37 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 4.21 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.73 | 10.13 | +3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIL | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.48 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.58 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.44 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | -0.06 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIL and URA is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SIL vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than URA's 4.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.10% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.30% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Drawdowns
SIL vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and URA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIL | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.99% | -93.54% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.91% | -28.43% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.63% | -37.90% | -17.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.04% | -61.45% | -1.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.68% | -45.04% | +21.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.79% | -75.40% | +23.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.53% | 11.82% | -2.29% |
Volatility
SIL vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 19.45% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 16.31%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIL | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.45% | 16.31% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.52% | 38.54% | +3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.72% | 49.21% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 43.00% | -4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.74% | 37.23% | +2.51% |