SIL vs. NUGT
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT).
SIL and NUGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIL is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Stuttgart Solactive AG Global Silver Miners (USD). It was launched on Apr 19, 2010. NUGT is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (300%). It was launched on Apr 1, 2020. Both SIL and NUGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SIL or NUGT.
Key characteristics
| SIL | NUGT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.98% | 13.82% |
| 1Y Return | 40.65% | 38.87% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.51% | -11.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.40% | -21.27% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.21% | -23.41% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.35 | 0.61 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.94 | 1.21 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.15 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.67 | 0.38 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.06 | 2.47 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.59% | 15.46% |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.93% | 62.74% |
| Max Drawdown | -82.99% | -99.97% |
| Current Drawdown | -57.41% | -99.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIL and NUGT is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SIL vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a 21.98% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's 13.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has outperformed NUGT with an annualized return of 3.21%, while NUGT has yielded a comparatively lower -23.41% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIL vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.23% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SIL vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SIL vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison
SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than NUGT's 1.82% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 0.41% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.22% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% | 0.08% | 0.66% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares | 1.82% | 1.66% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SIL vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and NUGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SIL vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is 13.03%, while Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) has a volatility of 20.72%. This indicates that SIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.