SI=F vs. SBOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Silver (SI=F) and SilverBow Resources, Inc. (SBOW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SI=F or SBOW.
Key characteristics
| SI=F | SBOW |
|---|
Correlation
The correlation between SI=F and SBOW is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SI=F vs. SBOW - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SI=F vs. SBOW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver (SI=F) and SilverBow Resources, Inc. (SBOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
SI=F vs. SBOW - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
SI=F vs. SBOW - Volatility Comparison
Silver (SI=F) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to SilverBow Resources, Inc. (SBOW) at 0.00%. This indicates that SI=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.