Correlation
The correlation between SI=F and GLTR is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
SI=F vs. GLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about Silver (SI=F) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR).
GLTR is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SI=F or GLTR.
Performance
SI=F vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
SI=F:
0.15
GLTR:
1.44
SI=F:
0.64
GLTR:
1.83
SI=F:
1.08
GLTR:
1.22
SI=F:
0.24
GLTR:
1.93
SI=F:
1.27
GLTR:
6.02
SI=F:
8.24%
GLTR:
4.27%
SI=F:
31.56%
GLTR:
19.76%
SI=F:
-91.54%
GLTR:
-55.70%
SI=F:
-31.29%
GLTR:
-2.07%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SI=F achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly lower than GLTR's 21.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SI=F has underperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 7.17%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.
SI=F
14.19%
1.16%
9.24%
4.90%
14.68%
13.14%
7.17%
GLTR
21.78%
0.59%
19.29%
28.10%
14.25%
10.52%
8.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SI=F vs. GLTR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SI=F
GLTR
SI=F vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver (SI=F) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Drawdowns
SI=F vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SI=F drawdown since its inception was -91.54%, which is greater than GLTR's maximum drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SI=F and GLTR.
Loading data...
Volatility
SI=F vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Silver (SI=F) is 5.68%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that SI=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...