PortfoliosLab logo
SHYF vs. CMCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SHYF and CMCO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SHYF vs. CMCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Shyft Group, Inc. (SHYF) and Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SHYF:

-0.28

CMCO:

-0.98

Sortino Ratio

SHYF:

0.02

CMCO:

-1.30

Omega Ratio

SHYF:

1.00

CMCO:

0.77

Calmar Ratio

SHYF:

-0.21

CMCO:

-0.77

Martin Ratio

SHYF:

-0.62

CMCO:

-1.57

Ulcer Index

SHYF:

29.04%

CMCO:

37.42%

Daily Std Dev

SHYF:

65.81%

CMCO:

59.71%

Max Drawdown

SHYF:

-94.35%

CMCO:

-95.20%

Current Drawdown

SHYF:

-80.60%

CMCO:

-65.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHYF:

$344.46M

CMCO:

$512.16M

EPS

SHYF:

$0.02

CMCO:

$0.32

PE Ratio

SHYF:

492.00

CMCO:

55.94

PS Ratio

SHYF:

0.43

CMCO:

0.52

PB Ratio

SHYF:

1.33

CMCO:

0.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHYF:

$792.89M

CMCO:

$716.14M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHYF:

$163.43M

CMCO:

$238.47M

EBITDA (TTM)

SHYF:

$31.34M

CMCO:

$64.45M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYF achieves a -13.38% return, which is significantly higher than CMCO's -50.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SHYF has outperformed CMCO with an annualized return of 9.39%, while CMCO has yielded a comparatively lower -2.32% annualized return.


SHYF

YTD

-13.38%

1M

26.98%

6M

-29.38%

1Y

-18.38%

5Y*

-7.31%

10Y*

9.39%

CMCO

YTD

-50.72%

1M

41.33%

6M

-50.82%

1Y

-58.33%

5Y*

-3.74%

10Y*

-2.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SHYF vs. CMCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SHYF is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SHYF is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SHYF is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SHYF is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SHYF is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SHYF is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMCO is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMCO is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMCO is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMCO is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMCO is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMCO is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SHYF vs. CMCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Shyft Group, Inc. (SHYF) and Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SHYF Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is higher than the CMCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYF and CMCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SHYF vs. CMCO - Dividend Comparison

SHYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than CMCO's 1.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SHYF
The Shyft Group, Inc.
1.98%1.70%1.64%0.80%0.20%0.35%0.55%1.38%0.63%1.08%3.22%1.90%
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
1.54%0.75%0.72%0.83%0.52%0.62%0.57%0.63%0.40%0.59%0.85%0.43%

Drawdowns

SHYF vs. CMCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYF drawdown since its inception was -94.35%, roughly equal to the maximum CMCO drawdown of -95.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYF and CMCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SHYF vs. CMCO - Volatility Comparison

The Shyft Group, Inc. (SHYF) has a higher volatility of 27.12% compared to Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) at 14.92%. This indicates that SHYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SHYF vs. CMCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Shyft Group, Inc. and Columbus McKinnon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20212022202320242025
204.60M
234.14M
(SHYF) Total Revenue
(CMCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SHYF vs. CMCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Shyft Group, Inc. and Columbus McKinnon Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
19.7%
35.1%
(SHYF) Gross Margin
(CMCO) Gross Margin
SHYF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Shyft Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 40.30M and revenue of 204.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.7%.

CMCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported a gross profit of 82.10M and revenue of 234.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.

SHYF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Shyft Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 204.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.

CMCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported an operating income of 17.69M and revenue of 234.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

SHYF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Shyft Group, Inc. reported a net income of -1.44M and revenue of 204.60M, resulting in a net margin of -0.7%.

CMCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported a net income of 3.96M and revenue of 234.14M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.