SHYF vs. CMCO
Compare and contrast key facts about The Shyft Group, Inc. (SHYF) and Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SHYF or CMCO.
Correlation
The correlation between SHYF and CMCO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SHYF vs. CMCO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SHYF:
-0.13
CMCO:
-0.16
SHYF:
0.21
CMCO:
-0.01
SHYF:
1.03
CMCO:
1.00
SHYF:
-0.09
CMCO:
-0.12
SHYF:
-0.45
CMCO:
-0.28
SHYF:
16.29%
CMCO:
18.28%
SHYF:
55.84%
CMCO:
31.96%
SHYF:
-94.35%
CMCO:
-95.20%
SHYF:
-77.80%
CMCO:
-30.67%
Fundamentals
SHYF:
$432.56M
CMCO:
$1.10B
SHYF:
-$0.10
CMCO:
$0.52
SHYF:
$787.08M
CMCO:
$1.00B
SHYF:
$142.17M
CMCO:
$337.10M
SHYF:
$19.13M
CMCO:
$113.12M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHYF achieves a -3.23% return, which is significantly higher than CMCO's -3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SHYF has outperformed CMCO with an annualized return of 9.40%, while CMCO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.59% annualized return.
SHYF
-3.23%
-15.53%
-1.14%
-6.15%
-8.21%
9.40%
CMCO
-3.75%
-3.24%
6.12%
-5.11%
-0.58%
3.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SHYF vs. CMCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Shyft Group, Inc. (SHYF) and Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SHYF vs. CMCO - Dividend Comparison
SHYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than CMCO's 0.75% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHYF The Shyft Group, Inc. | 1.72% | 1.64% | 0.80% | 0.20% | 0.35% | 0.55% | 1.38% | 0.63% | 1.08% | 3.22% | 1.90% | 1.49% |
CMCO Columbus McKinnon Corporation | 0.75% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.52% | 0.62% | 0.57% | 0.63% | 0.40% | 0.59% | 0.85% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SHYF vs. CMCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHYF drawdown since its inception was -94.35%, roughly equal to the maximum CMCO drawdown of -95.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYF and CMCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SHYF vs. CMCO - Volatility Comparison
The Shyft Group, Inc. (SHYF) has a higher volatility of 18.56% compared to Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) at 7.87%. This indicates that SHYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SHYF vs. CMCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Shyft Group, Inc. and Columbus McKinnon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities