SHV vs. LQD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD).
SHV and LQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Short Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both SHV and LQD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SHV or LQD.
Performance
SHV vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHV achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's 1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SHV has underperformed LQD with an annualized return of 1.63%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.47% annualized return.
SHV
4.57%
0.37%
2.59%
5.23%
2.27%
1.63%
LQD
1.65%
-0.73%
3.41%
8.08%
0.07%
2.47%
Key characteristics
| SHV | LQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 19.54 | 1.10 |
| Sortino Ratio | 131.65 | 1.62 |
| Omega Ratio | 52.51 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 193.31 | 0.47 |
| Martin Ratio | 1,943.02 | 3.66 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 0.27% | 7.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.46% | -24.95% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -10.48% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHV vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SHV and LQD have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SHV and LQD is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SHV vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SHV vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than LQD's 4.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF | 5.15% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.40% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% | 3.39% | 3.83% |
Drawdowns
SHV vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHV drawdown since its inception was -0.46%, smaller than the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHV and LQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SHV vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) is 0.07%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 2.32%. This indicates that SHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.