SHM vs. RSPN
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN).
SHM and RSPN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Municipal Managed Money Short. It was launched on Oct 10, 2007. RSPN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2006. Both SHM and RSPN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SHM or RSPN.
Key characteristics
| SHM | RSPN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.40% | 27.38% |
| 1Y Return | 3.70% | 43.09% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.19% | 11.50% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.75% | 15.61% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.01% | 11.95% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.75 | 3.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.67 | 4.32 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.54 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.08 | 5.46 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.03 | 18.46 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.65% | 2.34% |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.23% | 14.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.61% | -61.64% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.86% | -0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHM and RSPN is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
SHM vs. RSPN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SHM achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than RSPN's 27.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SHM has underperformed RSPN with an annualized return of 1.01%, while RSPN has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHM vs. RSPN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPN's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SHM vs. RSPN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SHM vs. RSPN - Dividend Comparison
SHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than RSPN's 0.86% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHM SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF | 1.89% | 1.22% | 0.76% | 1.00% | 1.65% | 1.41% | 1.33% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 0.92% | 0.98% |
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 0.86% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SHM vs. RSPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHM drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum RSPN drawdown of -61.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHM and RSPN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SHM vs. RSPN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) is 0.87%, while Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that SHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.