SHM vs. RSPN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN).

SHM and RSPN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Municipal Managed Money Short. It was launched on Oct 10, 2007. RSPN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2006. Both SHM and RSPN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SHM vs. RSPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SHM vs. RSPN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SHM SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF	0.11%	3.95%	1.22%	2.92%	-3.82%	-0.37%	2.65%	3.64%	1.56%	0.99%
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	1.89%	13.84%	17.63%	22.32%	-8.79%	26.07%	18.07%	33.17%	-13.23%	23.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHM achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than RSPN's 1.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SHM has underperformed RSPN with an annualized return of 1.16%, while RSPN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.

SHM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 0.53%
• 1Y: 3.17%
• 3Y*: 2.26%
• 5Y*: 0.83%
• 10Y*: 1.16%

RSPN

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: -9.20%
• YTD: 1.89%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 18.74%
• 3Y*: 16.50%
• 5Y*: 11.11%
• 10Y*: 13.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHM vs. RSPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPN's 0.40% expense ratio.

RSPN

Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF

SHM

SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF

Return for Risk

SHM vs. RSPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHM

SHM Risk / Return Rank: 81
SHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SHM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SHM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

RSPN

RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 58
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHM vs. RSPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHM	RSPN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	0.94	+0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	1.45	+0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.19	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	1.51	+0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.17	5.88	+0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHM vs. RSPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHM Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the RSPN Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHM and RSPN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHM	RSPN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	0.94	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.62	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.69	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.51	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between SHM and RSPN is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

SHM vs. RSPN - Dividend Comparison

SHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than RSPN's 0.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SHM SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF	2.64%	2.61%	2.06%	1.15%	0.69%	0.86%	1.24%	1.40%	1.23%	1.06%	0.94%	0.92%
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	0.86%	0.86%	0.98%	1.06%	1.09%	0.70%	0.96%	1.33%	1.49%	1.12%	1.31%	1.51%

Drawdowns

SHM vs. RSPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHM drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum RSPN drawdown of -59.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHM and RSPN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHM	RSPN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.61%	-59.61%	+48.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.67%	-12.85%	+11.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.67%	-21.88%	+15.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.61%	-42.02%	+30.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-9.74%	+8.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-7.69%	+6.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.53%	3.30%	-2.77%

Volatility

SHM vs. RSPN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) is 0.53%, while Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that SHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHM	RSPN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.53%	5.96%	-5.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.89%	11.55%	-10.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83%	20.10%	-18.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.07%	18.09%	-16.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.31%	20.30%	-16.99%