SHM vs. ON
SHM (SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Municipal Managed Money Short, while ON (ON Semiconductor Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SHM returned 1.20%/yr vs 30.01%/yr for ON. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SHM vs. ON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHM achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than ON's 147.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SHM has underperformed ON with an annualized return of 1.20%, while ON has yielded a comparatively higher 30.01% annualized return.
SHM
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- 1.20%
ON
- 1D
- 4.11%
- 1M
- 31.25%
- YTD
- 147.33%
- 6M
- 134.35%
- 1Y
- 182.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 28.51%
- 10Y*
- 30.01%
SHM vs. ON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHM SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF | 0.78% | 3.95% | 1.22% | 2.92% | -3.82% | -0.37% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 1.56% | 0.99% |
ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 147.33% | -14.12% | -24.52% | 33.93% | -8.17% | 107.52% | 34.25% | 47.67% | -21.16% | 64.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHM and ON is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2007 | -0.01 |
The correlation between SHM and ON shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHM vs. ON — Risk / Return Rank
SHM
ON
SHM vs. ON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHM | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.48 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 6.54 | -3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | 13.24 | -5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHM | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 3.49 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.54 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.59 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.11 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
SHM vs. ON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHM drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum ON drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHM and ON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHM | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | -96.22% | +84.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -28.10% | +26.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.03% | -70.44% | +68.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.67% | -70.44% | +63.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.61% | -70.44% | +58.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | 0.00% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -53.23% | +52.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 13.86% | -13.42% |
Volatility
SHM vs. ON - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) is 0.35%, while ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) has a volatility of 19.99%. This indicates that SHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHM | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 19.99% | -19.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.85% | 38.66% | -37.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26% | 53.87% | -52.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 52.95% | -50.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 50.92% | -47.61% |
Dividends
SHM vs. ON - Dividend Comparison
SHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while ON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHM SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF | 2.67% | 2.61% | 2.06% | 1.15% | 0.69% | 0.86% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHM and ON have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ON has higher volatility (19.99%) compared to SHM (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHM dropped -11.61% vs ON's -96.22%.
ON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHM and ON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer