PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHLE.TO vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SHLE.TO vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Source Energy Services Ltd. (SHLE.TO) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SHLE.TO is traded in CAD, while ^NDX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^NDX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLE.TO achieves a -21.53% return, which is significantly lower than ^NDX's 15.97% return.


SHLE.TO

1D
-5.85%
1M
-11.70%
6M
-27.76%
YTD
-21.53%
1Y
-14.12%
3Y*
30.04%
5Y*
46.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-22.35%

^NDX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-6.46%
6M
13.10%
YTD
15.97%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
25.43%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
20.72%
ALL TIME*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLE.TO vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHLE.TO
Source Energy Services Ltd.
-21.53%-6.47%172.48%215.34%18.13%2.56%-45.83%-81.40%-85.81%-11.92%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
15.97%14.68%35.45%50.15%-28.72%26.56%44.08%32.28%7.28%11.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SHLE.TO and ^NDX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHLE.TO vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLE.TO
SHLE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SHLE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
^NDX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
^NDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLE.TO vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Source Energy Services Ltd. (SHLE.TO) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHLE.TO^NDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.25

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

2.16

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

6.76

-7.61

SHLE.TO vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHLE.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHLE.TO and ^NDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHLE.TO vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLE.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.47%, which is greater than ^NDX's maximum drawdown of -38.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLE.TO and ^NDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHLE.TO^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.47%

-38.10%

-61.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.79%

-12.37%

-22.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.34%

-22.81%

-37.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.02%

-32.52%

-35.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.37%

-6.79%

-83.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.20%

-6.87%

-77.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.52%

3.94%

+12.58%

Volatility

SHLE.TO vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison

Source Energy Services Ltd. (SHLE.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) at 7.55%. This indicates that SHLE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHLE.TO^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

7.55%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.10%

15.74%

+15.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.58%

18.98%

+30.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.28%

23.77%

+51.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.31%

23.66%

+81.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHLE.TO and ^NDX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHLE.TO and ^NDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer