SHF.DE vs. CDNS
Compare and contrast key facts about SNP Schneider-Neureither & Partner SE (SHF.DE) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SHF.DE or CDNS.
Correlation
The correlation between SHF.DE and CDNS is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SHF.DE vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SHF.DE:
2.06
CDNS:
-0.03
SHF.DE:
3.27
CDNS:
0.21
SHF.DE:
1.50
CDNS:
1.03
SHF.DE:
1.26
CDNS:
-0.05
SHF.DE:
8.67
CDNS:
-0.10
SHF.DE:
6.00%
CDNS:
11.80%
SHF.DE:
25.21%
CDNS:
35.96%
SHF.DE:
-79.86%
CDNS:
-93.13%
SHF.DE:
-9.14%
CDNS:
-6.93%
Fundamentals
SHF.DE:
€371.44M
CDNS:
$83.34B
SHF.DE:
€1.94
CDNS:
$3.80
SHF.DE:
26.29
CDNS:
79.97
SHF.DE:
0.00
CDNS:
3.21
SHF.DE:
€182.82M
CDNS:
$3.29B
SHF.DE:
€48.44M
CDNS:
$2.96B
SHF.DE:
€21.24M
CDNS:
$1.12B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHF.DE achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SHF.DE has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 18.56%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.75% annualized return.
SHF.DE
7.07%
5.38%
18.93%
52.05%
-1.88%
18.56%
CDNS
1.13%
1.63%
11.96%
-0.88%
30.98%
32.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SHF.DE vs. CDNS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SHF.DE
CDNS
SHF.DE vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SNP Schneider-Neureither & Partner SE (SHF.DE) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SHF.DE vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
Neither SHF.DE nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHF.DE SNP Schneider-Neureither & Partner SE | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SHF.DE vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHF.DE drawdown since its inception was -79.86%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHF.DE and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SHF.DE vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SNP Schneider-Neureither & Partner SE (SHF.DE) is 6.39%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that SHF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SHF.DE vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SNP Schneider-Neureither & Partner SE and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities