PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHAPX vs. FLCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHAPX vs. FLCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SHAPX having a 6.73% return and FLCNX slightly lower at 6.67%.


SHAPX

1D
0.82%
1M
1.26%
6M
4.30%
YTD
6.73%
1Y
13.56%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
13.03%
ALL TIME*
12.98%

FLCNX

1D
1.28%
1M
-1.95%
6M
4.58%
YTD
6.67%
1Y
14.53%
3Y*
23.48%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SHAPX vs. FLCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
6.73%14.32%22.37%19.50%-12.56%23.52%14.53%29.84%-2.19%10.26%
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
6.67%22.05%35.37%37.67%-27.13%24.21%30.85%30.91%-2.16%13.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SHAPX and FLCNX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.90

The correlation between SHAPX and FLCNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHAPX vs. FLCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHAPX
SHAPX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SHAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCNX
FLCNX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHAPX vs. FLCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHAPXFLCNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.05

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

4.10

+1.80

SHAPX vs. FLCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the FLCNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHAPX and FLCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHAPX vs. FLCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHAPX drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, which is greater than FLCNX's maximum drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAPX and FLCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHAPXFLCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.19%

-32.07%

-14.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-11.73%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.15%

-20.14%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.53%

-32.07%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-3.23%

+2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-6.57%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

3.00%

-0.97%

Volatility

SHAPX vs. FLCNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) is 2.82%, while Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that SHAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHAPXFLCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

4.05%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

12.28%

-3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

15.63%

-4.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

19.27%

-4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.73%

20.38%

-3.65%

SHAPX vs. FLCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHAPX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHAPX vs. FLCNX - Dividend Comparison

SHAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.19%, more than FLCNX's 10.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
10.76%8.35%0.36%0.49%1.18%0.46%0.21%0.30%0.33%0.15%0.00%0.00%
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
13.19%14.08%9.00%4.17%8.85%6.54%4.13%7.09%6.71%5.10%3.29%4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHAPX and FLCNX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCNX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to SHAPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAPX dropped -46.19% vs FLCNX's -32.07%.

SHAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHAPX and FLCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer