SH vs. SCHK
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SH is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 (-100%), while SCHK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SH returned -9.07%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for SCHK. At a correlation of -0.99, they often move in opposite directions. SH charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
SH vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than SCHK's 11.04% return.
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
SCHK
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- —
SH vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -4.68% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 11.04% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 31.31% | -5.09% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and SCHK is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017 | -0.99 |
The correlation between SH and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SH vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SH
SCHK
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SH
SCHK
Basic Materials
SH
-
SCHK
Communication Services
SH
-
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
SH
-
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
SH
-
SCHK
Energy
SH
-
SCHK
Healthcare
SH
-
SCHK
Industrials
SH
-
SCHK
Real Estate
SH
-
SCHK
Technology
SH
-
SCHK
Utilities
SH
-
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
SH
SCHK
SH vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SH | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.41 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 3.11 | -4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | 14.34 | -16.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SH | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.47 | 2.29 | -3.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | 0.77 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 0.78 | -1.37 |
Drawdowns
SH vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than SCHK's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -34.80% | -59.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.28% | -8.97% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -19.21% | -19.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | -25.44% | -19.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.62% | -0.74% | -93.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.73% | -5.18% | -62.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.89% | 1.94% | +7.95% |
Volatility
SH vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 2.98% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 9.17% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 12.16% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 17.23% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 19.12% | -1.11% |
SH vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SH vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than SCHK's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SH and SCHK have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHK has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 13.14% vs -9.07% for SH. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 13.14% return vs -9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SH.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 1.01% for SCHK.
SH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SCHK is Large Cap Growth Equities. SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%), while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SH and 0.05% for SCHK.
SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer