SH vs. FR
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) is Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 (-100%), while FR (First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SH returned -12.89%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for FR. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SH vs. FR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than FR's 6.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has underperformed FR with an annualized return of -12.89%, while FR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
FR
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 26.63%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
SH vs. FR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
FR First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 6.39% | 18.17% | -2.01% | 11.91% | -25.37% | 60.33% | 4.24% | 47.37% | -5.61% | 15.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and FR is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | -0.57 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SH and FR has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.57 to -0.31, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. FR — Risk / Return Rank
SH
FR
SH vs. FR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SH | FR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.23 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 2.61 | -3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | 8.30 | -10.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SH | FR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.47 | 1.36 | -2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | 0.26 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.72 | 0.50 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 0.20 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
SH vs. FR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, roughly equal to the maximum FR drawdown of -95.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and FR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | FR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -95.42% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.28% | -10.24% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -25.42% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | -35.95% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.12% | -41.12% | -35.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.62% | -6.21% | -88.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.73% | -25.36% | -42.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.89% | 3.22% | +6.67% |
Volatility
SH vs. FR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 2.84%, while First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | FR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 5.52% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 13.69% | -4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 19.61% | -7.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 22.81% | -5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 24.35% | -6.34% |
Dividends
SH vs. FR - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than FR's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FR First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 3.04% | 3.11% | 2.95% | 2.43% | 2.45% | 1.63% | 2.37% | 2.22% | 3.01% | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.30% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SH and FR have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs FR's -95.42%.
FR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and FR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer