SGENX vs. TIBAX
SGENX (First Eagle Global Fund Class A) and TIBAX (Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund) are both mutual funds - SGENX is a Global Equities fund managed by First Eagle, while TIBAX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Thornburg. Over the past 10 years, SGENX returned 10.11%/yr vs 12.70%/yr for TIBAX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGENX charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TIBAX.
Performance
SGENX vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGENX achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly lower than TIBAX's 17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SGENX has underperformed TIBAX with an annualized return of 10.11%, while TIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.70% annualized return.
SGENX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 4.14%
- 1Y
- 21.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
TIBAX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 6M
- 18.19%
- 1Y
- 36.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.02%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
SGENX vs. TIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGENX First Eagle Global Fund Class A | 4.80% | 31.62% | 11.78% | 12.77% | -6.46% | 12.20% | 8.33% | 20.16% | -8.46% | 13.48% |
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund | 17.44% | 36.62% | 13.23% | 18.01% | -7.95% | 20.08% | -0.67% | 17.72% | -4.54% | 14.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGENX and TIBAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2002 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SGENX and TIBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.81 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGENX vs. TIBAX — Risk / Return Rank
SGENX
TIBAX
SGENX vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Global Fund Class A (SGENX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGENX | TIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.85 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 6.86 | -4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 26.22 | -19.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGENX vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGENX drawdown since its inception was -37.60%, smaller than the maximum TIBAX drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGENX and TIBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGENX | TIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.60% | -49.12% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -5.43% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.53% | -9.20% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.57% | -20.94% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.68% | -34.85% | +7.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -0.40% | -5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -5.98% | +2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 1.42% | +1.73% |
Volatility
SGENX vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison
First Eagle Global Fund Class A (SGENX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) at 2.87%. This indicates that SGENX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGENX | TIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 2.87% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 7.32% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 8.76% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 11.15% | +0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.54% | 13.46% | -0.92% |
SGENX vs. TIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGENX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGENX vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison
SGENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, more than TIBAX's 4.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGENX First Eagle Global Fund Class A | 9.02% | 9.45% | 5.46% | 3.52% | 4.17% | 6.27% | 2.38% | 5.48% | 6.35% | 4.23% | 4.72% | 1.16% |
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund | 4.93% | 5.64% | 5.44% | 4.67% | 5.62% | 5.10% | 4.11% | 4.23% | 4.49% | 4.22% | 3.83% | 4.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGENX and TIBAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGENX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to TIBAX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGENX dropped -37.60% vs TIBAX's -49.12%.
TIBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGENX and TIBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer