PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SGDM vs. URA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SGDMURA
YTD Return12.14%9.88%
1Y Return22.54%16.70%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.94%5.26%
5Y Return (Ann)5.09%25.96%
10Y Return (Ann)4.97%4.03%
Sharpe Ratio0.710.42
Sortino Ratio1.160.83
Omega Ratio1.141.10
Calmar Ratio0.490.20
Martin Ratio2.831.22
Ulcer Index7.59%12.20%
Daily Std Dev30.36%35.79%
Max Drawdown-54.95%-93.54%
Current Drawdown-24.06%-67.94%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between SGDM and URA is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SGDM vs. URA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SGDM achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDM has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 4.97%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.03% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.39%
-3.47%
SGDM
URA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SGDM vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.


URA
Global X Uranium ETF
Expense ratio chart for URA: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%
Expense ratio chart for SGDM: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SGDM vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGDM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SGDM, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.71
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SGDM, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SGDM, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SGDM, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SGDM, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.83
URA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for URA, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for URA, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for URA, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for URA, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for URA, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.22

SGDM vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDM and URA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.71
0.42
SGDM
URA

Dividends

SGDM vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

SGDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than URA's 5.62% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
1.24%1.39%1.42%1.33%0.30%0.25%0.50%0.57%0.02%1.47%0.26%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
5.62%6.07%0.76%5.85%1.69%1.66%0.45%2.03%7.28%1.96%4.28%0.54%

Drawdowns

SGDM vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDM drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDM and URA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-24.06%
-9.15%
SGDM
URA

Volatility

SGDM vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 8.19%. This indicates that SGDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.94%
8.19%
SGDM
URA