SGDM vs. FTIHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX).
SGDM is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2014. FTIHX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. Both SGDM and FTIHX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SGDM vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SGDM vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 13.63% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 44.27% | -15.14% | 10.46% |
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund | 1.79% | 32.59% | 4.98% | 15.49% | -16.29% | 8.45% | 11.09% | 21.50% | -14.40% | 25.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGDM achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than FTIHX's 1.79% return.
SGDM
- 1D
- 4.81%
- 1M
- -17.00%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 27.33%
- 1Y
- 111.01%
- 3Y*
- 42.57%
- 5Y*
- 24.69%
- 10Y*
- 16.46%
FTIHX
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGDM vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGDM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SGDM vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank
SGDM
FTIHX
SGDM vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGDM | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.44 | 1.74 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | 2.32 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 2.38 | +1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 9.30 | +3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGDM | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 1.74 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.48 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.56 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between SGDM and FTIHX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SGDM vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison
SGDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than FTIHX's 2.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 0.92% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund | 2.73% | 2.78% | 2.88% | 2.78% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 1.62% | 2.61% | 2.21% | 0.45% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SGDM vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDM drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, which is greater than FTIHX's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDM and FTIHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGDM | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.95% | -35.75% | -19.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.04% | -11.25% | -18.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.06% | -29.99% | -15.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.00% | -8.61% | -8.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.53% | -7.31% | -18.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.33% | 2.88% | +5.45% |
Volatility
SGDM vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a higher volatility of 16.86% compared to Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) at 7.78%. This indicates that SGDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SGDM | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.86% | 7.78% | +9.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.34% | 11.04% | +27.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.74% | 16.05% | +29.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.29% | 15.09% | +20.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.07% | 16.02% | +21.05% |