PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SG vs. Z
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SG and Z is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

SG vs. Z - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) and Zillow Group, Inc. (Z). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
34.34%
51.03%
SG
Z

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SG:

2.65

Z:

0.97

Sortino Ratio

SG:

3.43

Z:

1.84

Omega Ratio

SG:

1.41

Z:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

SG:

2.80

Z:

0.62

Martin Ratio

SG:

15.99

Z:

3.24

Ulcer Index

SG:

14.15%

Z:

15.43%

Daily Std Dev

SG:

85.26%

Z:

51.61%

Max Drawdown

SG:

-88.09%

Z:

-86.51%

Current Drawdown

SG:

-36.79%

Z:

-61.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SG:

$3.87B

Z:

$17.75B

EPS

SG:

-$0.78

Z:

-$0.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

SG:

$515.92M

Z:

$1.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SG:

$71.83M

Z:

$1.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

SG:

-$10.76M

Z:

$68.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SG achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than Z's 5.15% return.


SG

YTD

4.49%

1M

-0.39%

6M

38.43%

1Y

224.30%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Z

YTD

5.15%

1M

3.17%

6M

54.45%

1Y

48.19%

5Y*

10.20%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SG vs. Z — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SG is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SG is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SG is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SG is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SG is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SG is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

Z
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of Z is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of Z is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of Z is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of Z is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of Z is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of Z is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SG vs. Z - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) and Zillow Group, Inc. (Z). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SG, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.650.97
The chart of Sortino ratio for SG, currently valued at 3.43, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.431.84
The chart of Omega ratio for SG, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.411.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for SG, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.801.25
The chart of Martin ratio for SG, currently valued at 15.99, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0015.993.24
SG
Z

The current SG Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the Z Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SG and Z, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.65
0.97
SG
Z

Dividends

SG vs. Z - Dividend Comparison

Neither SG nor Z has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SG vs. Z - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SG drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, roughly equal to the maximum Z drawdown of -86.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SG and Z. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-36.79%
-8.88%
SG
Z

Volatility

SG vs. Z - Volatility Comparison

Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) has a higher volatility of 16.88% compared to Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) at 11.23%. This indicates that SG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than Z based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
16.88%
11.23%
SG
Z

Financials

SG vs. Z - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sweetgreen, Inc. and Zillow Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab