PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SG vs. CAVA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SGCAVA
YTD Return235.40%237.44%
1Y Return309.29%362.47%
Sharpe Ratio3.886.73
Sortino Ratio4.265.66
Omega Ratio1.521.80
Calmar Ratio3.948.13
Martin Ratio26.8061.23
Ulcer Index12.12%5.99%
Daily Std Dev83.66%54.53%
Max Drawdown-88.09%-47.50%
Current Drawdown-28.49%-1.87%

Fundamentals


SGCAVA
Market Cap$4.54B$16.90B
EPS-$0.78$0.18
Total Revenue (TTM)$668.95M$669.67M
Gross Profit (TTM)-$10.41M$124.20M
EBITDA (TTM)-$20.57M$80.80M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between SG and CAVA is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SG vs. CAVA - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SG having a 235.40% return and CAVA slightly higher at 237.44%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.77%
84.45%
SG
CAVA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SG vs. CAVA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) and CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SG, currently valued at 3.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SG, currently valued at 4.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.26
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SG, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SG, currently valued at 7.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.007.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SG, currently valued at 26.80, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0026.80
CAVA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CAVA, currently valued at 6.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.73
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CAVA, currently valued at 5.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CAVA, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.80
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CAVA, currently valued at 8.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CAVA, currently valued at 61.23, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0061.23

SG vs. CAVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SG Sharpe Ratio is 3.88, which is lower than the CAVA Sharpe Ratio of 6.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SG and CAVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.006.007.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.88
6.73
SG
CAVA

Dividends

SG vs. CAVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither SG nor CAVA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SG vs. CAVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SG drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than CAVA's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SG and CAVA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.19%
-1.87%
SG
CAVA

Volatility

SG vs. CAVA - Volatility Comparison

Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) has a higher volatility of 15.76% compared to CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) at 8.31%. This indicates that SG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.76%
8.31%
SG
CAVA

Financials

SG vs. CAVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sweetgreen, Inc. and CAVA Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items