PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFYX vs. XMHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFYX vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SFYX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMHQ

1D
0.50%
1M
4.20%
YTD
9.49%
6M
9.51%
1Y
14.33%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFYX vs. XMHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SFYX
SoFi Next 500 ETF
5.66%14.25%14.45%17.70%-22.88%18.89%17.63%6.95%
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
9.49%4.71%16.79%29.51%-12.42%20.98%26.61%6.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYX and XMHQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.89

The correlation between SFYX and XMHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SFYX vs. XMHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFYX
XMHQ

Industrials

20.5%
25.8%

Technology

16.9%
12.1%

Financial Services

15.9%
15.1%

Healthcare

12.1%
19.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.7%

Real Estate

6.4%

-

Communication Services

4.5%
2.7%

Energy

4.5%
6.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
3.9%

Utilities

2.2%
2.2%

Industrials

SFYX
20.5%
XMHQ
25.8%

Technology

SFYX
16.9%
XMHQ
12.1%

Financial Services

SFYX
15.9%
XMHQ
15.1%

Healthcare

SFYX
12.1%
XMHQ
19.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SFYX
9.9%
XMHQ
9.7%

Real Estate

SFYX
6.4%
XMHQ

-

Communication Services

SFYX
4.5%
XMHQ
2.7%

Energy

SFYX
4.5%
XMHQ
6.7%

Basic Materials

SFYX
3.2%
XMHQ
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

SFYX
3.0%
XMHQ
3.9%

Utilities

SFYX
2.2%
XMHQ
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFYX vs. XMHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYX

XMHQ
XMHQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XMHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XMHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYX vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SFYX vs. XMHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFYXXMHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

Drawdowns

SFYX vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFYXXMHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

Volatility

SFYX vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFYXXMHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.71%

SFYX vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SFYX vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison

SFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than XMHQ's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFYX
SoFi Next 500 ETF
1.36%1.44%1.25%1.51%1.56%0.90%1.16%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
0.55%0.64%5.20%0.73%1.72%1.00%1.12%1.22%1.59%1.06%1.63%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFYX and XMHQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XMHQ.

SFYX has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.55% for XMHQ.

SFYX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XMHQ is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SFYX tracks Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index, while XMHQ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFYX and 0.25% for XMHQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFYX and XMHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer