SFYX vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
SFYX and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SFYX is a passively managed fund by Toroso Investments that tracks the performance of the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2019. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. Both SFYX and XMHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SFYX or XMHQ.
Performance
SFYX vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFYX achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 20.94% return.
SFYX
17.18%
1.66%
8.44%
30.50%
8.94%
N/A
XMHQ
20.94%
-2.45%
-1.15%
31.16%
16.79%
12.04%
Key characteristics
| SFYX | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.57 | 1.69 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.18 | 2.43 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.25 | 2.93 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.92 | 7.18 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.22% | 4.21% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.27% | 17.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.59% | -58.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.29% | -4.01% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SFYX vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SFYX and XMHQ is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SFYX vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SFYX vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
SFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than XMHQ's 4.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.51% | 1.57% | 0.90% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 4.98% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.64% | 1.34% | 1.25% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
SFYX vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFYX drawdown since its inception was -39.59%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYX and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SFYX vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) at 5.77%. This indicates that SFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.