SFY vs. SMH
SFY (SoFi Select 500 ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFY returned 15.91%/yr vs 38.76%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFY charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
SFY vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFY achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 74.25% return.
SFY
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- 1Y
- 35.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.66%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 20.06%
- YTD
- 74.25%
- 6M
- 74.08%
- 1Y
- 150.04%
- 3Y*
- 63.96%
- 5Y*
- 38.76%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
SFY vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 14.75% | 22.67% | 29.81% | 29.36% | -22.84% | 28.03% | 24.52% | 13.38% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 74.25% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 27.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFY and SMH is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SFY and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SFY vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFY
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SFY
SMH
Communication Services
SFY
SMH
-
Financial Services
SFY
SMH
-
Healthcare
SFY
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
SFY
SMH
-
Industrials
SFY
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
SFY
SMH
-
Energy
SFY
SMH
-
Utilities
SFY
SMH
-
Real Estate
SFY
SMH
-
Basic Materials
SFY
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFY vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
SFY
SMH
SFY vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.69 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 10.11 | -6.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.42 | 38.76 | -24.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 4.94 | -2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 1.11 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.34 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
SFY vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFY drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFY and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -84.96% | +51.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -14.93% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.04% | -35.74% | +14.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.72% | -45.30% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -1.63% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -41.08% | +34.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 3.89% | -1.42% |
Volatility
SFY vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) is 4.00%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that SFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 11.58% | -7.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 24.35% | -13.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 30.57% | -16.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 35.01% | -16.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 32.57% | -12.38% |
SFY vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFY has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFY vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
SFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 0.90% | 1.18% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFY and SMH have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to SFY (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFY dropped -33.25% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 38.76% vs 15.91% for SFY. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SFY has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.76% return vs 15.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
SFY has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SFY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. SFY tracks Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFY and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFY and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer