PortfoliosLab logo
SFSNX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SFSNX and VOO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

SFSNX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
110.71%
561.80%
SFSNX
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SFSNX:

-0.09

VOO:

0.55

Sortino Ratio

SFSNX:

0.03

VOO:

0.89

Omega Ratio

SFSNX:

1.00

VOO:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

SFSNX:

-0.08

VOO:

0.57

Martin Ratio

SFSNX:

-0.24

VOO:

2.26

Ulcer Index

SFSNX:

8.19%

VOO:

4.67%

Daily Std Dev

SFSNX:

22.35%

VOO:

19.16%

Max Drawdown

SFSNX:

-62.71%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

SFSNX:

-18.34%

VOO:

-9.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFSNX achieves a -11.22% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -5.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SFSNX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.99%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.


SFSNX

YTD

-11.22%

1M

-4.02%

6M

-11.03%

1Y

-0.53%

5Y*

11.07%

10Y*

2.99%

VOO

YTD

-5.07%

1M

-0.81%

6M

-3.75%

1Y

11.95%

5Y*

16.26%

10Y*

12.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SFSNX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFSNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Expense ratio chart for SFSNX: current value is 0.25%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SFSNX: 0.25%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value is 0.03%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
VOO: 0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SFSNX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFSNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SFSNX is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SFSNX is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SFSNX is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SFSNX is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SFSNX is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SFSNX is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SFSNX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for SFSNX, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
SFSNX: -0.09
VOO: 0.55
The chart of Sortino ratio for SFSNX, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
SFSNX: 0.03
VOO: 0.89
The chart of Omega ratio for SFSNX, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
SFSNX: 1.00
VOO: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for SFSNX, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
SFSNX: -0.08
VOO: 0.57
The chart of Martin ratio for SFSNX, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.00
SFSNX: -0.24
VOO: 2.26

The current SFSNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFSNX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.09
0.55
SFSNX
VOO

Dividends

SFSNX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SFSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than VOO's 1.37% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
1.93%1.71%1.37%1.22%1.35%1.42%1.41%1.91%1.42%1.22%1.58%1.22%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.37%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

SFSNX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -62.71%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-18.34%
-9.25%
SFSNX
VOO

Volatility

SFSNX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 14.05% and 13.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.05%
13.82%
SFSNX
VOO