SFSNX vs. IWO
SFSNX (Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund) and IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) are both funds - SFSNX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while IWO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, SFSNX returned 10.97%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for IWO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFSNX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWO.
Performance
SFSNX vs. IWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SFSNX having a 15.97% return and IWO slightly higher at 16.75%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SFSNX having a 10.97% annualized return and IWO not far ahead at 11.23%.
SFSNX
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 15.97%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 32.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
IWO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 16.75%
- 6M
- 15.06%
- 1Y
- 37.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
SFSNX vs. IWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 15.97% | 7.66% | 8.99% | 20.15% | -14.79% | 30.91% | 8.49% | 24.44% | -12.26% | 12.84% |
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 16.75% | 12.90% | 15.04% | 18.51% | -26.27% | 2.54% | 34.68% | 28.48% | -9.43% | 22.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFSNX and IWO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SFSNX and IWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SFSNX vs. IWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFSNX
IWO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
SFSNX
IWO
Technology
SFSNX
IWO
Financial Services
SFSNX
IWO
Consumer Cyclical
SFSNX
IWO
Real Estate
SFSNX
IWO
Healthcare
SFSNX
IWO
Energy
SFSNX
IWO
Basic Materials
SFSNX
IWO
Consumer Defensive
SFSNX
IWO
Communication Services
SFSNX
IWO
Utilities
SFSNX
IWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFSNX vs. IWO — Risk / Return Rank
SFSNX
IWO
SFSNX vs. IWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFSNX | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 2.51 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 8.99 | +2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFSNX | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.75 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.23 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.47 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.28 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SFSNX vs. IWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, roughly equal to the maximum IWO drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and IWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFSNX | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.32% | -60.11% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -14.87% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.91% | -28.57% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.91% | -40.51% | +14.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.82% | -42.02% | -2.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.51% | +1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -16.71% | +8.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 4.14% | -1.25% |
Volatility
SFSNX vs. IWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) is 4.54%, while iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that SFSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFSNX | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 6.61% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 15.65% | -3.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.10% | 21.34% | -4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 24.48% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 24.13% | -0.85% |
SFSNX vs. IWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFSNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWO's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SFSNX vs. IWO - Dividend Comparison
SFSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than IWO's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.56% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 1.37% | 7.05% | 12.27% | 1.42% | 3.66% | 11.55% | 6.88% | 1.86% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFSNX and IWO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWO has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to SFSNX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFSNX dropped -58.32% vs IWO's -60.11%.
SFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFSNX and IWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer