PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLR vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFLR vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLR achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 8.88% return.


SFLR

1D
-0.99%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
3.43%
6M
3.07%
1Y
15.38%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHB

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
8.88%
6M
7.77%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLR vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
3.43%13.29%19.99%21.20%0.42%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
8.88%16.94%23.93%26.16%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLR and SCHB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022

0.92

The correlation between SFLR and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFLR vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLR vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFLRSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.72

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

12.04

-3.13

SFLR vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLR and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFLR vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLR drawdown since its inception was -12.13%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLR and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLRSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-35.27%

+23.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-8.91%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-19.34%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-2.86%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-4.11%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.01%

-0.28%

Volatility

SFLR vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) is 4.37%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that SFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFLRSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

5.00%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

10.09%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

12.83%

-3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.32%

17.35%

-7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.32%

18.34%

-8.02%

SFLR vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFLR vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than SCHB's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.33%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SFLR and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHB has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to SFLR (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLR dropped -12.13% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 3-year performance, SCHB leads with 20.64% vs 14.80% for SFLR. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SFLR has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 14.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.33% for SFLR.

SFLR is categorized as Options Trading, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SFLR and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFLR and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer