PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SFL vs. FTEC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SFL and FTEC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

SFL vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-15.13%
10.81%
SFL
FTEC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SFL:

-0.72

FTEC:

1.20

Sortino Ratio

SFL:

-0.80

FTEC:

1.65

Omega Ratio

SFL:

0.89

FTEC:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

SFL:

-0.65

FTEC:

1.76

Martin Ratio

SFL:

-1.19

FTEC:

6.12

Ulcer Index

SFL:

16.89%

FTEC:

4.40%

Daily Std Dev

SFL:

27.93%

FTEC:

22.41%

Max Drawdown

SFL:

-85.65%

FTEC:

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

SFL:

-30.91%

FTEC:

-0.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFL achieves a -8.12% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SFL has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 5.27%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 20.38% annualized return.


SFL

YTD

-8.12%

1M

-11.00%

6M

-14.40%

1Y

-20.57%

5Y*

2.32%

10Y*

5.27%

FTEC

YTD

3.16%

1M

1.36%

6M

12.66%

1Y

29.45%

5Y*

20.54%

10Y*

20.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SFL vs. FTEC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SFL is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SFL is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SFL is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SFL is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SFL is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SFL is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTEC is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTEC is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTEC is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTEC is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTEC is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTEC is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SFL vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SFL, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.721.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for SFL, currently valued at -0.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.801.65
The chart of Omega ratio for SFL, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.891.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for SFL, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.651.76
The chart of Martin ratio for SFL, currently valued at -1.19, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.196.12
SFL
FTEC

The current SFL Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFL and FTEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.72
1.20
SFL
FTEC

Dividends

SFL vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

SFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.40%, more than FTEC's 0.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SFL
SFL Corporation Ltd.
11.40%10.47%8.60%9.54%7.73%15.92%9.63%13.30%10.32%12.12%10.50%11.54%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.47%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%1.09%

Drawdowns

SFL vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFL drawdown since its inception was -85.65%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFL and FTEC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-30.91%
-0.96%
SFL
FTEC

Volatility

SFL vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 7.68%. This indicates that SFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
11.17%
7.68%
SFL
FTEC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab