SFL vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Performance
SFL vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SFL vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFL SFL Corporation Ltd. | 40.82% | -14.49% | -0.83% | 34.55% | 23.52% | 39.84% | -51.90% | 53.41% | -24.82% | 16.81% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.24% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Fundamentals
SFL:
$1.43B
ET:
$70.45B
SFL:
-$0.20
ET:
$1.37
SFL:
1.99
ET:
0.84
SFL:
1.49
ET:
1.44
SFL:
$719.75M
ET:
$82.63B
SFL:
$239.28M
ET:
$18.01B
SFL:
$406.71M
ET:
$14.93B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFL achieves a 40.82% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 19.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SFL has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 7.78%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 20.51% annualized return.
SFL
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 40.82%
- 6M
- 49.76%
- 1Y
- 45.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
ET
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 19.24%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.52%
- 5Y*
- 29.51%
- 10Y*
- 20.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFL vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
SFL
ET
SFL vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFL | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 0.51 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 0.86 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.12 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 0.65 | +1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 1.82 | +2.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFL | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 0.51 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 1.17 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.56 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.36 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between SFL and ET is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SFL vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
SFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than ET's 6.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFL SFL Corporation Ltd. | 8.06% | 12.04% | 10.47% | 8.60% | 9.54% | 7.73% | 15.92% | 9.63% | 13.30% | 10.32% | 12.12% | 10.50% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.87% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Drawdowns
SFL vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFL drawdown since its inception was -85.65%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFL and ET.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFL | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.65% | -87.81% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.06% | -17.33% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.05% | -25.82% | -20.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.33% | -72.82% | +17.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.44% | -1.88% | -7.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -25.95% | +5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.75% | 6.24% | +4.51% |
Volatility
SFL vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.96%. This indicates that SFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SFL | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 4.96% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.53% | 11.68% | +9.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.86% | 23.80% | +12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 25.48% | +5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.65% | 36.63% | -2.98% |
Financials
SFL vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SFL Corporation Ltd. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SFL vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
SFL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SFL Corporation Ltd. reported a gross profit of 99.74M and revenue of 170.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 5.78B and revenue of 22.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.
SFL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SFL Corporation Ltd. reported an operating income of 31.81M and revenue of 170.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
SFL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SFL Corporation Ltd. reported a net income of -4.65M and revenue of 170.69M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.46B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.