SFL vs. DHT
SFL (SFL Corporation Ltd.) and DHT (DHT Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. SFL operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while DHT operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, SFL returned 7.79%/yr vs 23.41%/yr for DHT. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SFL vs. DHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFL achieves a 52.74% return, which is significantly lower than DHT's 73.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SFL has underperformed DHT with an annualized return of 7.79%, while DHT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.41% annualized return.
SFL
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 52.74%
- 6M
- 55.33%
- 1Y
- 45.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
DHT
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 14.84%
- YTD
- 73.66%
- 6M
- 75.24%
- 1Y
- 88.53%
- 3Y*
- 46.17%
- 5Y*
- 33.25%
- 10Y*
- 23.41%
SFL vs. DHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFL SFL Corporation Ltd. | 52.74% | -14.49% | -0.83% | 34.55% | 23.52% | 39.84% | -51.90% | 53.41% | -24.82% | 16.81% |
DHT DHT Holdings, Inc. | 73.66% | 40.04% | 3.58% | 24.07% | 73.87% | 1.41% | -20.52% | 118.96% | 11.32% | -9.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFL and DHT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2005 | 0.48 |
The correlation between SFL and DHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SFL:
$1.53B
DHT:
$3.22B
SFL:
$0.24
DHT:
$2.06
SFL:
48.42
DHT:
9.69
SFL:
2.74
DHT:
0.32
SFL:
2.15
DHT:
5.67
SFL:
1.58
DHT:
2.61
SFL:
$708.94M
DHT:
$566.07M
SFL:
$243.14M
DHT:
$268.69M
SFL:
$427.17M
DHT:
$450.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFL vs. DHT — Risk / Return Rank
SFL
DHT
SFL vs. DHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFL | DHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.39 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 5.85 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 13.36 | -9.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFL vs. DHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFL drawdown since its inception was -85.65%, smaller than the maximum DHT drawdown of -97.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFL and DHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFL | DHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.65% | -97.12% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.06% | -15.22% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.05% | -24.96% | -21.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.05% | -34.44% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.33% | -39.56% | -15.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.57% | -59.91% | +51.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.93% | -76.34% | +56.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.98% | 6.81% | +4.17% |
Volatility
SFL vs. DHT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) is 8.58%, while DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) has a volatility of 11.78%. This indicates that SFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFL | DHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 11.78% | -3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.50% | 28.31% | -7.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.52% | 34.57% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.29% | 38.48% | -8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.64% | 41.64% | -8.00% |
Dividends
SFL vs. DHT - Dividend Comparison
SFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, less than DHT's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHT DHT Holdings, Inc. | 7.36% | 6.06% | 10.76% | 11.72% | 1.35% | 2.50% | 25.81% | 2.42% | 2.04% | 5.57% | 17.15% | 6.55% |
SFL SFL Corporation Ltd. | 7.14% | 12.04% | 10.47% | 8.60% | 9.54% | 7.73% | 15.92% | 9.63% | 13.30% | 10.32% | 12.12% | 10.50% |
Financials
SFL vs. DHT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SFL Corporation Ltd. and DHT Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SFL vs. DHT - Profitability Comparison
SFL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SFL Corporation Ltd. reported a gross profit of 52.45M and revenue of 174.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.1%.
DHT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.62M and revenue of 186.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.
SFL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SFL Corporation Ltd. reported an operating income of 44.85M and revenue of 174.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.
DHT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.66M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.7%.
SFL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SFL Corporation Ltd. reported a net income of 26.08M and revenue of 174.48M, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
DHT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 164.53M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in a net margin of 88.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SFL and DHT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHT has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to SFL (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFL dropped -85.65% vs DHT's -97.12%.
DHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFL and DHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer