PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SFL vs. DHT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SFLDHT
YTD Return-4.86%10.77%
1Y Return0.15%7.89%
3Y Return (Ann)13.26%25.57%
5Y Return (Ann)2.15%16.43%
10Y Return (Ann)5.04%13.27%
Sharpe Ratio0.030.31
Sortino Ratio0.220.69
Omega Ratio1.031.08
Calmar Ratio0.030.11
Martin Ratio0.081.31
Ulcer Index11.58%7.27%
Daily Std Dev26.60%30.30%
Max Drawdown-85.65%-97.12%
Current Drawdown-27.86%-82.35%

Fundamentals


SFLDHT
Market Cap$1.35B$1.64B
EPS$1.00$0.98
PE Ratio10.0710.36
PEG Ratio-1.573.77
Total Revenue (TTM)$884.88M$447.18M
Gross Profit (TTM)$334.41M$170.94M
EBITDA (TTM)$560.25M$161.29M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between SFL and DHT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SFL vs. DHT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SFL achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than DHT's 10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SFL has underperformed DHT with an annualized return of 5.04%, while DHT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-25.83%
-12.78%
SFL
DHT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SFL vs. DHT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SFL, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SFL, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SFL, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SFL, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SFL, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.08
DHT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DHT, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DHT, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DHT, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DHT, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DHT, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.31

SFL vs. DHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the DHT Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFL and DHT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.03
0.31
SFL
DHT

Dividends

SFL vs. DHT - Dividend Comparison

SFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.43%, more than DHT's 9.56% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SFL
SFL Corporation Ltd.
10.43%8.60%9.54%7.73%15.92%9.63%13.30%10.32%12.12%10.50%11.54%7.14%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
9.56%11.72%1.35%2.50%25.81%2.42%2.04%5.57%17.15%6.55%1.09%1.17%

Drawdowns

SFL vs. DHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFL drawdown since its inception was -85.65%, smaller than the maximum DHT drawdown of -97.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFL and DHT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-27.86%
-82.35%
SFL
DHT

Volatility

SFL vs. DHT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) is 4.98%, while DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that SFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.98%
8.96%
SFL
DHT

Financials

SFL vs. DHT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SFL Corporation Ltd. and DHT Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items