SF vs. WFC
Compare and contrast key facts about Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SF or WFC.
Correlation
The correlation between SF and WFC is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SF vs. WFC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SF:
1.52
WFC:
1.89
SF:
2.39
WFC:
2.75
SF:
1.30
WFC:
1.36
SF:
3.12
WFC:
3.20
SF:
9.30
WFC:
8.53
SF:
4.30%
WFC:
6.26%
SF:
26.30%
WFC:
28.25%
SF:
-78.40%
WFC:
-79.01%
SF:
-11.64%
WFC:
-4.34%
Fundamentals
SF:
$11.29B
WFC:
$264.27B
SF:
$6.25
WFC:
$5.37
SF:
17.68
WFC:
14.96
SF:
0.93
WFC:
3.55
SF:
$4.36B
WFC:
$80.14B
SF:
$3.55B
WFC:
$81.61B
SF:
$1.08B
WFC:
$49.21B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SF achieves a -2.05% return, which is significantly lower than WFC's 10.88% return. Over the past 10 years, SF has outperformed WFC with an annualized return of 12.16%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.43% annualized return.
SF
-2.05%
-9.66%
19.72%
38.37%
20.51%
12.16%
WFC
10.88%
0.44%
38.15%
48.74%
13.07%
6.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SF vs. WFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SF
WFC
SF vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SF vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison
SF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than WFC's 2.00% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF Stifel Financial Corp. | 1.62% | 1.58% | 2.08% | 2.06% | 0.85% | 0.90% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.00% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
SF vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SF drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, roughly equal to the maximum WFC drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SF and WFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SF vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison
Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) at 4.96%. This indicates that SF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SF vs. WFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stifel Financial Corp. and Wells Fargo & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities