SF vs. WFC
Compare and contrast key facts about Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SF or WFC.
Correlation
The correlation between SF and WFC is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SF vs. WFC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SF:
0.42
WFC:
0.45
SF:
0.83
WFC:
0.85
SF:
1.12
WFC:
1.12
SF:
0.42
WFC:
0.61
SF:
1.60
WFC:
1.79
SF:
9.07%
WFC:
8.42%
SF:
34.98%
WFC:
33.40%
SF:
-78.40%
WFC:
-79.01%
SF:
-28.56%
WFC:
-21.03%
Fundamentals
SF:
$8.68B
WFC:
$208.68B
SF:
$6.25
WFC:
$5.56
SF:
13.38
WFC:
11.51
SF:
0.85
WFC:
1.59
SF:
1.76
WFC:
2.70
SF:
1.78
WFC:
1.30
SF:
$4.03B
WFC:
$59.27B
SF:
$3.49B
WFC:
$60.75B
SF:
$806.52M
WFC:
$30.94B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SF achieves a -20.80% return, which is significantly lower than WFC's -8.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SF has outperformed WFC with an annualized return of 10.11%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively lower 4.66% annualized return.
SF
-20.80%
-13.65%
-16.42%
14.57%
26.62%
10.11%
WFC
-8.46%
-9.68%
1.22%
16.18%
20.76%
4.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SF vs. WFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SF
WFC
SF vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SF vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison
SF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than WFC's 2.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF Stifel Financial Corp. | 2.06% | 1.58% | 2.08% | 2.06% | 0.85% | 0.90% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.42% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
SF vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SF drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, roughly equal to the maximum WFC drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SF and WFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SF vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison
Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) has a higher volatility of 22.25% compared to Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) at 16.05%. This indicates that SF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SF vs. WFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stifel Financial Corp. and Wells Fargo & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities