SF vs. WFC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SF (Stifel Financial Corp.) and WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — SF in Capital Markets, WFC in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, SF returned 17.02%/yr vs 7.65%/yr for WFC. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SF vs. WFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SF achieves a -16.10% return, which is significantly lower than WFC's -13.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SF has outperformed WFC with an annualized return of 17.02%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.65% annualized return.

SF

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -9.49%
• YTD: -16.10%
• 6M: -12.63%
• 1Y: 13.73%
• 3Y*: 23.41%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: 17.02%

WFC

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: -13.86%
• 6M: -6.99%
• 1Y: 8.65%
• 3Y*: 27.57%
• 5Y*: 14.04%
• 10Y*: 7.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SF vs. WFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SF Stifel Financial Corp.	-16.10%	20.07%	56.37%	21.24%	-15.57%	40.79%	26.32%	47.99%	-29.86%	19.71%
WFC Wells Fargo & Company	-13.86%	35.57%	46.48%	22.94%	-11.92%	61.15%	-41.65%	21.44%	-21.83%	13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SF and WFC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 1983	0.35

Over the past year, SF and WFC have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SF : $7.66B WFC : $255.59B
EPS SF : $8.03 WFC : $6.73
PE Ratio SF : 8.64 WFC : 11.81
PS Ratio SF : 1.17 WFC : 2.04
PB Ratio SF : 1.44 WFC : 1.57
Total Revenue (TTM) SF : $6.51B WFC : $125.70B
Gross Profit (TTM) SF : $5.60B WFC : $81.14B
EBITDA (TTM) SF : $1.45B WFC : $31.58B

Return for Risk

SF vs. WFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SF

SF Risk / Return Rank: 54
SF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SF Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SF Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SF Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SF Martin Ratio Rank: 56

WFC

WFC Risk / Return Rank: 47
WFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
WFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
WFC Omega Ratio Rank: 43
WFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
WFC Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SF vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SF	WFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	0.33	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	0.61	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.08	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	0.37	+0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.46	0.87	+0.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SF vs. WFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SF Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the WFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SF and WFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SF	WFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54	0.33	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.47	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.24	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.33	-0.09

Drawdowns

SF vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SF drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, roughly equal to the maximum WFC drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SF and WFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SF	WFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.37%	-79.01%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.20%	-23.02%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.67%	-24.73%	-9.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.25%	-37.10%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.89%	-64.46%	+12.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.14%	-16.71%	-4.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.18%	-15.35%	-13.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.87%	9.87%	-1.00%

Volatility

SF vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) is 5.71%, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a volatility of 8.07%. This indicates that SF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SF	WFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	8.07%	-2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.96%	19.94%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.73%	26.51%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.21%	30.21%	+1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.20%	32.28%	+2.92%

Dividends

SF vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison

SF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than WFC's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SF Stifel Financial Corp.	1.86%	1.47%	1.58%	2.08%	2.06%	0.85%	0.90%	0.99%	1.16%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%
WFC Wells Fargo & Company	2.27%	1.82%	2.14%	2.64%	2.66%	1.25%	4.04%	3.57%	3.56%	2.54%	2.75%	2.71%

Financials

SF vs. WFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stifel Financial Corp. and Wells Fargo & Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stifel Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.8%.

WFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 20.31B and revenue of 31.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.

SF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stifel Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 542.38M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.

WFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 5.85B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

SF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stifel Financial Corp. reported a net income of 251.42M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.

WFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.29B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SF and WFC in my portfolio?

SF and WFC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SF or WFC?

WFC has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to SF (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SF dropped -78.37% vs WFC's -79.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.