PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SF vs. PIPR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SFPIPR
YTD Return70.93%95.64%
1Y Return98.50%140.94%
3Y Return (Ann)17.33%27.48%
5Y Return (Ann)25.96%39.59%
10Y Return (Ann)15.03%22.48%
Sharpe Ratio3.834.14
Sortino Ratio5.305.34
Omega Ratio1.691.70
Calmar Ratio4.127.77
Martin Ratio33.5439.70
Ulcer Index2.92%3.55%
Daily Std Dev25.55%34.09%
Max Drawdown-78.40%-76.97%
Current Drawdown-0.96%-2.80%

Fundamentals


SFPIPR
Market Cap$12.03B$5.35B
EPS$5.48$9.35
PE Ratio21.2336.09
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.75B$1.52B
Gross Profit (TTM)$4.68B$1.41B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.35B$235.16M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between SF and PIPR is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SF vs. PIPR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SF achieves a 70.93% return, which is significantly lower than PIPR's 95.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SF has underperformed PIPR with an annualized return of 15.03%, while PIPR has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
40.96%
60.45%
SF
PIPR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SF vs. PIPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SF, currently valued at 3.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SF, currently valued at 5.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SF, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.69
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SF, currently valued at 4.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SF, currently valued at 33.54, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0033.54
PIPR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PIPR, currently valued at 4.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PIPR, currently valued at 5.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PIPR, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.70
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PIPR, currently valued at 7.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.007.77
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PIPR, currently valued at 39.70, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0039.70

SF vs. PIPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SF Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is comparable to the PIPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SF and PIPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.83
4.14
SF
PIPR

Dividends

SF vs. PIPR - Dividend Comparison

SF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than PIPR's 1.02% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
SF
Stifel Financial Corp.
1.39%2.08%2.06%0.85%0.90%0.99%1.16%0.34%
PIPR
Piper Sandler Companies
1.02%2.09%5.30%3.81%1.98%3.14%4.74%1.45%

Drawdowns

SF vs. PIPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SF drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, roughly equal to the maximum PIPR drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SF and PIPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.96%
-2.80%
SF
PIPR

Volatility

SF vs. PIPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) is 14.24%, while Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) has a volatility of 19.64%. This indicates that SF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.24%
19.64%
SF
PIPR

Financials

SF vs. PIPR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stifel Financial Corp. and Piper Sandler Companies. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items