PortfoliosLab logo
SF vs. MS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SF and MS is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SF vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SF:

0.51

MS:

1.05

Sortino Ratio

SF:

1.09

MS:

1.52

Omega Ratio

SF:

1.15

MS:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

SF:

0.62

MS:

1.16

Martin Ratio

SF:

1.82

MS:

3.63

Ulcer Index

SF:

11.88%

MS:

9.34%

Daily Std Dev

SF:

36.73%

MS:

34.27%

Max Drawdown

SF:

-78.40%

MS:

-88.12%

Current Drawdown

SF:

-19.53%

MS:

-8.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SF:

$9.68B

MS:

$205.40B

EPS

SF:

$5.24

MS:

$8.53

PE Ratio

SF:

17.98

MS:

15.01

PEG Ratio

SF:

0.85

MS:

150.62

PS Ratio

SF:

1.92

MS:

3.21

PB Ratio

SF:

1.99

MS:

2.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

SF:

$5.50B

MS:

$105.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SF:

$4.50B

MS:

$59.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

SF:

$1.42B

MS:

$23.80B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SF achieves a -10.79% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 3.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SF has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 10.70%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.95% annualized return.


SF

YTD

-10.79%

1M

5.38%

6M

-17.98%

1Y

18.52%

3Y*

16.36%

5Y*

24.36%

10Y*

10.70%

MS

YTD

3.34%

1M

6.50%

6M

-1.29%

1Y

35.04%

3Y*

18.29%

5Y*

27.75%

10Y*

15.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Stifel Financial Corp.

Morgan Stanley

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SF vs. MS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SF is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SF is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SF is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SF is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SF is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SF is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

MS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MS is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MS is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MS is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MS is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MS is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MS is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SF vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SF Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the MS Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SF and MS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SF vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

SF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than MS's 2.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SF
Stifel Financial Corp.
2.31%1.58%2.08%2.06%0.85%0.90%0.99%1.16%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MS
Morgan Stanley
2.89%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%0.90%

Drawdowns

SF vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SF drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SF and MS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SF vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Morgan Stanley (MS) at 7.75%. This indicates that SF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SF vs. MS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stifel Financial Corp. and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
1.47B
27.91B
(SF) Total Revenue
(MS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SF vs. MS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stifel Financial Corp. and Morgan Stanley over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
69.3%
58.7%
(SF) Gross Margin
(MS) Gross Margin
SF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Stifel Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.

MS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 16.38B and revenue of 27.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.7%.

SF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Stifel Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 289.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.

MS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 5.54B and revenue of 27.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

SF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Stifel Financial Corp. reported a net income of 52.99M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

MS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 4.32B and revenue of 27.91B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.