PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SF vs. MS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SF and MS is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

SF vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
31.15%
39.89%
SF
MS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SF:

1.97

MS:

2.68

Sortino Ratio

SF:

2.98

MS:

3.57

Omega Ratio

SF:

1.37

MS:

1.51

Calmar Ratio

SF:

3.99

MS:

4.25

Martin Ratio

SF:

12.23

MS:

16.95

Ulcer Index

SF:

4.18%

MS:

4.19%

Daily Std Dev

SF:

25.99%

MS:

26.55%

Max Drawdown

SF:

-78.40%

MS:

-88.12%

Current Drawdown

SF:

-6.15%

MS:

-1.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SF:

$11.28B

MS:

$223.29B

EPS

SF:

$6.35

MS:

$8.07

PE Ratio

SF:

17.38

MS:

17.22

PEG Ratio

SF:

0.92

MS:

3.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

SF:

$4.36B

MS:

$59.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SF:

$3.55B

MS:

$36.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

SF:

$1.08B

MS:

$20.33B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SF achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 11.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SF has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 13.61%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 17.47% annualized return.


SF

YTD

4.04%

1M

-3.08%

6M

30.05%

1Y

46.53%

5Y*

21.60%

10Y*

13.61%

MS

YTD

11.26%

1M

1.45%

6M

38.56%

1Y

65.97%

5Y*

23.84%

10Y*

17.47%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SF vs. MS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SF is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SF is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SF is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SF is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SF is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SF is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MS is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MS is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MS is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MS is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MS is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MS is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SF vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SF, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.972.68
The chart of Sortino ratio for SF, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.983.57
The chart of Omega ratio for SF, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.371.51
The chart of Calmar ratio for SF, currently valued at 3.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.994.25
The chart of Martin ratio for SF, currently valued at 12.23, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0012.2316.95
SF
MS

The current SF Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the MS Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SF and MS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.97
2.68
SF
MS

Dividends

SF vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

SF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than MS's 2.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SF
Stifel Financial Corp.
1.52%1.58%2.08%2.06%0.85%0.90%0.99%1.16%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MS
Morgan Stanley
2.61%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%0.90%

Drawdowns

SF vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SF drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SF and MS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.15%
-1.51%
SF
MS

Volatility

SF vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Morgan Stanley (MS) at 6.05%. This indicates that SF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
7.04%
6.05%
SF
MS

Financials

SF vs. MS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stifel Financial Corp. and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab