SF vs. MS
Compare and contrast key facts about Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Morgan Stanley (MS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SF or MS.
Correlation
The correlation between SF and MS is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SF vs. MS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SF:
1.97
MS:
2.68
SF:
2.98
MS:
3.57
SF:
1.37
MS:
1.51
SF:
3.99
MS:
4.25
SF:
12.23
MS:
16.95
SF:
4.18%
MS:
4.19%
SF:
25.99%
MS:
26.55%
SF:
-78.40%
MS:
-88.12%
SF:
-6.15%
MS:
-1.51%
Fundamentals
SF:
$11.28B
MS:
$223.29B
SF:
$6.35
MS:
$8.07
SF:
17.38
MS:
17.22
SF:
0.92
MS:
3.66
SF:
$4.36B
MS:
$59.38B
SF:
$3.55B
MS:
$36.09B
SF:
$1.08B
MS:
$20.33B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SF achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 11.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SF has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 13.61%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 17.47% annualized return.
SF
4.04%
-3.08%
30.05%
46.53%
21.60%
13.61%
MS
11.26%
1.45%
38.56%
65.97%
23.84%
17.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SF vs. MS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SF
MS
SF vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SF vs. MS - Dividend Comparison
SF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than MS's 2.61% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF Stifel Financial Corp. | 1.52% | 1.58% | 2.08% | 2.06% | 0.85% | 0.90% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MS Morgan Stanley | 2.61% | 2.82% | 3.49% | 3.47% | 2.14% | 2.04% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.73% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
SF vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SF drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SF and MS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SF vs. MS - Volatility Comparison
Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Morgan Stanley (MS) at 6.05%. This indicates that SF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SF vs. MS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stifel Financial Corp. and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities