PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SF vs. EVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SF vs. EVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Evercore Inc. (EVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SF achieves a -11.05% return, which is significantly lower than EVR's 8.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SF has underperformed EVR with an annualized return of 19.21%, while EVR has yielded a comparatively higher 25.51% annualized return.


SF

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.83%
YTD
-11.05%
6M
-13.24%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
26.90%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
19.21%

EVR

1D
-1.98%
1M
6.20%
YTD
8.31%
6M
5.75%
1Y
44.22%
3Y*
48.53%
5Y*
24.36%
10Y*
25.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SF vs. EVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SF
Stifel Financial Corp.
-11.05%20.07%56.37%21.24%-15.57%40.79%26.32%47.99%-29.86%19.71%
EVR
Evercore Inc.
8.31%24.25%64.35%60.59%-17.60%26.29%51.68%7.39%-18.93%33.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SF and EVR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2006

0.61

The correlation between SF and EVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SF:

$8.12B

EVR:

$15.34B

EPS

SF:

$8.03

EVR:

$17.52

PE Ratio

SF:

9.16

EVR:

20.93

PS Ratio

SF:

1.24

EVR:

3.41

PB Ratio

SF:

1.53

EVR:

8.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

SF:

$6.51B

EVR:

$4.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SF:

$5.60B

EVR:

$4.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

SF:

$1.45B

EVR:

$1.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SF vs. EVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SF
SF Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SF Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

EVR
EVR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SF vs. EVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) and Evercore Inc. (EVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFEVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.48

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

3.74

-2.40

SF vs. EVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SF Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the EVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SF and EVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SF vs. EVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SF drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, roughly equal to the maximum EVR drawdown of -81.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SF and EVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFEVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.37%

-81.49%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.20%

-30.08%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.67%

-47.86%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.25%

-49.61%

+13.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.89%

-67.42%

+15.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.39%

-3.81%

-12.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.16%

-20.82%

-8.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.85%

11.84%

-1.99%

Volatility

SF vs. EVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) is 5.71%, while Evercore Inc. (EVR) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that SF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFEVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

10.29%

-4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.94%

28.00%

-8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.79%

35.91%

-10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.09%

35.78%

-4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.99%

36.71%

-1.72%

Dividends

SF vs. EVR - Dividend Comparison

SF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than EVR's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVR
Evercore Inc.
0.93%0.98%1.14%1.75%2.60%1.95%2.14%3.00%2.66%1.58%1.85%2.13%
SF
Stifel Financial Corp.
1.76%1.47%1.58%2.08%2.06%0.85%0.90%0.99%1.16%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SF vs. EVR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stifel Financial Corp. and Evercore Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B20222023202420252026
1.67B
1.40B
(SF) Total Revenue
(EVR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SF vs. EVR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stifel Financial Corp. and Evercore Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
82.8%
98.0%
Portfolio components
SF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stifel Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.8%.

EVR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Evercore Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.0%.

SF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stifel Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 542.38M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.

EVR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Evercore Inc. reported an operating income of 341.42M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.

SF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stifel Financial Corp. reported a net income of 251.42M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.

EVR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Evercore Inc. reported a net income of 301.24M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SF and EVR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVR has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to SF (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SF dropped -78.37% vs EVR's -81.49%.

EVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SF and EVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer