PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SENAX vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SENAX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SENAX achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 10.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SENAX has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 11.65%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.


SENAX

1D
1.42%
1M
4.38%
YTD
8.48%
6M
5.85%
1Y
15.85%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
11.65%

VOT

1D
0.13%
1M
5.28%
YTD
10.04%
6M
7.76%
1Y
13.33%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENAX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SENAX
Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund
8.48%13.41%19.25%24.00%-41.92%2.58%57.96%40.64%-5.97%28.54%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
10.04%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SENAX and VOT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006

0.95

The correlation between SENAX and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SENAX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SENAX
SENAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SENAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SENAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SENAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SENAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SENAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENAX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SENAXVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

0.84

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.94

2.50

+1.44

SENAX vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SENAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SENAX and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SENAX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENAX drawdown since its inception was -58.34%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENAX and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SENAXVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.34%

-60.16%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-15.96%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.44%

-21.77%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.14%

-37.19%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.14%

-37.19%

-17.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.48%

0.00%

-12.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.70%

-9.94%

-7.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

5.35%

-1.45%

Volatility

SENAX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) have volatilities of 6.76% and 6.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SENAXVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

6.71%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.29%

13.56%

+2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.81%

16.83%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.86%

21.51%

+7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.89%

21.07%

+4.82%

SENAX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SENAX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SENAX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

SENAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.12%, more than VOT's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SENAX
Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund
11.12%12.06%10.88%2.46%0.00%17.81%9.16%6.59%15.14%11.23%4.58%8.37%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.60%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SENAX and VOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SENAX has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to VOT (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENAX dropped -58.34% vs VOT's -60.16%.

VOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SENAX and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer