PortfoliosLab logo
SEM vs. NBN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SEM and NBN is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SEM vs. NBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) and Northeast Bank (NBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SEM:

-0.37

NBN:

1.46

Sortino Ratio

SEM:

-0.20

NBN:

2.28

Omega Ratio

SEM:

0.97

NBN:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

SEM:

-0.43

NBN:

2.21

Martin Ratio

SEM:

-1.02

NBN:

5.37

Ulcer Index

SEM:

14.51%

NBN:

10.33%

Daily Std Dev

SEM:

42.41%

NBN:

35.67%

Max Drawdown

SEM:

-60.26%

NBN:

-70.47%

Current Drawdown

SEM:

-29.13%

NBN:

-22.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SEM:

$1.97B

NBN:

$728.15M

EPS

SEM:

$0.62

NBN:

$8.98

PE Ratio

SEM:

24.76

NBN:

9.51

PEG Ratio

SEM:

1.37

NBN:

0.00

PS Ratio

SEM:

0.38

NBN:

3.95

PB Ratio

SEM:

1.14

NBN:

1.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEM:

$4.75B

NBN:

$250.25M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEM:

$415.92M

NBN:

$226.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

SEM:

$410.39M

NBN:

$77.60M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEM achieves a -17.94% return, which is significantly lower than NBN's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SEM has underperformed NBN with an annualized return of 6.50%, while NBN has yielded a comparatively higher 24.45% annualized return.


SEM

YTD

-17.94%

1M

-5.77%

6M

-23.34%

1Y

-14.84%

5Y*

14.29%

10Y*

6.50%

NBN

YTD

-6.87%

1M

-4.09%

6M

-14.13%

1Y

48.76%

5Y*

40.15%

10Y*

24.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SEM vs. NBN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SEM is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SEM is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SEM is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SEM is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SEM is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SEM is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

NBN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBN is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBN is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBN is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBN is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBN is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBN is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SEM vs. NBN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) and Northeast Bank (NBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SEM Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the NBN Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEM and NBN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SEM vs. NBN - Dividend Comparison

SEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than NBN's 0.05% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SEM
Select Medical Holdings Corporation
1.70%1.43%2.13%2.01%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.84%2.78%
NBN
Northeast Bank
0.05%0.04%0.07%0.10%0.11%0.18%0.18%0.24%0.17%0.31%0.38%1.24%

Drawdowns

SEM vs. NBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEM drawdown since its inception was -60.26%, smaller than the maximum NBN drawdown of -70.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEM and NBN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SEM vs. NBN - Volatility Comparison

Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) has a higher volatility of 28.08% compared to Northeast Bank (NBN) at 11.93%. This indicates that SEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SEM vs. NBN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Northeast Bank. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
1.35B
87.37M
(SEM) Total Revenue
(NBN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items