PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SEM vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SEM and COST is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

SEM vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.48%
12.78%
SEM
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SEM:

1.45

COST:

2.60

Sortino Ratio

SEM:

2.19

COST:

3.20

Omega Ratio

SEM:

1.29

COST:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

SEM:

1.28

COST:

4.72

Martin Ratio

SEM:

6.46

COST:

12.17

Ulcer Index

SEM:

8.17%

COST:

3.98%

Daily Std Dev

SEM:

36.45%

COST:

18.66%

Max Drawdown

SEM:

-60.26%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

SEM:

-11.44%

COST:

-4.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SEM:

$2.47B

COST:

$435.99B

EPS

SEM:

$2.14

COST:

$16.98

PE Ratio

SEM:

8.93

COST:

57.84

PEG Ratio

SEM:

1.37

COST:

5.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEM:

$6.97B

COST:

$258.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEM:

$846.76M

COST:

$32.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

SEM:

$860.88M

COST:

$12.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEM achieves a 54.46% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 45.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SEM has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 10.71%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.42% annualized return.


SEM

YTD

54.46%

1M

-7.08%

6M

5.49%

1Y

51.24%

5Y*

11.75%

10Y*

10.71%

COST

YTD

45.38%

1M

2.80%

6M

12.78%

1Y

47.55%

5Y*

28.68%

10Y*

23.42%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SEM vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SEM, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.452.60
The chart of Sortino ratio for SEM, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.193.20
The chart of Omega ratio for SEM, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.291.46
The chart of Calmar ratio for SEM, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.284.72
The chart of Martin ratio for SEM, currently valued at 6.46, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.006.4612.17
SEM
COST

The current SEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEM and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.45
2.60
SEM
COST

Dividends

SEM vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

SEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than COST's 2.04% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SEM
Select Medical Holdings Corporation
2.62%3.95%3.31%2.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.84%2.78%2.59%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.04%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

SEM vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEM drawdown since its inception was -60.26%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEM and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-11.44%
-4.08%
SEM
COST

Volatility

SEM vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.84%. This indicates that SEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
11.34%
4.84%
SEM
COST

Financials

SEM vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab