SEB vs. SQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Seaboard Corporation (SEB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).
Performance
SEB vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEB vs. SQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEB Seaboard Corporation | 27.26% | 83.47% | -31.75% | -5.21% | -3.84% | 30.14% | -28.49% | 20.41% | -19.65% | 11.76% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 17.65% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -32.71% | 115.00% |
Fundamentals
SEB:
$5.45B
SQM:
$23.12B
SEB:
$514.49
SQM:
$2.06
SEB:
10.99
SQM:
39.20
SEB:
0.12
SQM:
0.23
SEB:
0.56
SQM:
5.04
SEB:
1.05
SQM:
4.06
SEB:
$9.75B
SQM:
$4.59B
SEB:
$677.00M
SQM:
$1.36B
SEB:
$607.00M
SQM:
$1.27B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEB achieves a 27.26% return, which is significantly higher than SQM's 17.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SEB has underperformed SQM with an annualized return of 6.58%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.45% annualized return.
SEB
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- 10.16%
- YTD
- 27.26%
- 6M
- 55.20%
- 1Y
- 110.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 6.58%
SQM
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 88.65%
- 1Y
- 104.09%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 19.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEB vs. SQM — Risk / Return Rank
SEB
SQM
SEB vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seaboard Corporation (SEB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEB | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.48 | 2.04 | +1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.85 | 2.61 | +1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.32 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.50 | 4.06 | +1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.22 | 9.94 | +5.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEB | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48 | 2.04 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.26 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.42 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.42 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEB and SQM is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SEB vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
SEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, more than SQM's 0.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEB Seaboard Corporation | 0.16% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.25% | 0.24% | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.21% | 0.17% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Drawdowns
SEB vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEB drawdown since its inception was -70.20%, smaller than the maximum SQM drawdown of -78.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEB and SQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEB | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.20% | -78.34% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.84% | -25.02% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.00% | -69.76% | +25.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.37% | -72.98% | +24.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.36% | +18.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.15% | -30.43% | +6.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 10.22% | -3.06% |
Volatility
SEB vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is 9.39%, while Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a volatility of 17.99%. This indicates that SEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEB | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 17.99% | -8.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.77% | 36.57% | -12.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.82% | 51.41% | -19.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.18% | 49.55% | -22.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.86% | 45.99% | -17.13% |
Financials
SEB vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seaboard Corporation and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SEB vs. SQM - Profitability Comparison
SEB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seaboard Corporation reported a gross profit of 179.00M and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.4%.
SQM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 455.49M and revenue of 1.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.
SEB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seaboard Corporation reported an operating income of 53.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.
SQM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 398.13M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.
SEB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seaboard Corporation reported a net income of 252.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
SQM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a net income of 185.41M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.