PortfoliosLab logo
SEB vs. SQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SEB and SQM is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SEB vs. SQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seaboard Corporation (SEB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SEB:

-0.67

SQM:

-0.81

Sortino Ratio

SEB:

-0.92

SQM:

-1.30

Omega Ratio

SEB:

0.90

SQM:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

SEB:

-0.38

SQM:

-0.55

Martin Ratio

SEB:

-1.04

SQM:

-2.06

Ulcer Index

SEB:

17.45%

SQM:

18.76%

Daily Std Dev

SEB:

27.69%

SQM:

43.20%

Max Drawdown

SEB:

-70.20%

SQM:

-80.41%

Current Drawdown

SEB:

-42.10%

SQM:

-70.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SEB:

$2.63B

SQM:

$8.87B

EPS

SEB:

$99.86

SQM:

$2.11

PE Ratio

SEB:

26.81

SQM:

14.91

PEG Ratio

SEB:

0.00

SQM:

0.69

PS Ratio

SEB:

0.28

SQM:

1.98

PB Ratio

SEB:

0.55

SQM:

1.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEB:

$9.23B

SQM:

$4.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEB:

$657.00M

SQM:

$1.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

SEB:

$653.00M

SQM:

$1.15B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEB achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly higher than SQM's -16.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SEB has underperformed SQM with an annualized return of -1.99%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.04% annualized return.


SEB

YTD

10.37%

1M

3.62%

6M

2.59%

1Y

-18.31%

3Y*

-13.29%

5Y*

-1.60%

10Y*

-1.99%

SQM

YTD

-16.31%

1M

-11.02%

6M

-20.88%

1Y

-34.91%

3Y*

-31.73%

5Y*

7.55%

10Y*

8.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Seaboard Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SEB vs. SQM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SEB is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SEB is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SEB is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SEB is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SEB is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SEB is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SQM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SQM is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SQM is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SQM is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SQM is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SQM is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SQM is 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SEB vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seaboard Corporation (SEB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SEB Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is comparable to the SQM Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEB and SQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SEB vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison

SEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while SQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SEB
Seaboard Corporation
0.34%0.37%0.25%0.24%0.23%0.30%0.21%0.17%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
0.00%0.39%5.41%6.26%2.54%1.08%2.96%3.76%1.95%4.09%0.04%0.10%

Drawdowns

SEB vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEB drawdown since its inception was -70.20%, smaller than the maximum SQM drawdown of -80.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEB and SQM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SEB vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison

Seaboard Corporation (SEB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) have volatilities of 7.70% and 7.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SEB vs. SQM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seaboard Corporation and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
2.32B
1.07B
(SEB) Total Revenue
(SQM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SEB vs. SQM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Seaboard Corporation and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
6.6%
27.4%
(SEB) Gross Margin
(SQM) Gross Margin
SEB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Seaboard Corporation reported a gross profit of 152.00M and revenue of 2.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.6%.

SQM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 293.76M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

SEB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Seaboard Corporation reported an operating income of 38.00M and revenue of 2.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

SQM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 210.47M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.

SEB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Seaboard Corporation reported a net income of 32.00M and revenue of 2.32B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

SQM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a net income of 120.13M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.