PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDOW vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDOW vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDOW achieves a -18.49% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOW has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -38.16%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.44% annualized return.


SDOW

1D
-1.52%
1M
-10.30%
YTD
-18.49%
6M
-21.02%
1Y
-42.78%
3Y*
-33.02%
5Y*
-25.27%
10Y*
-38.16%

TQQQ

1D
1.37%
1M
33.57%
YTD
65.71%
6M
58.23%
1Y
145.30%
3Y*
69.92%
5Y*
29.86%
10Y*
45.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDOW vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDOW
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30
-18.49%-33.94%-25.95%-28.78%4.00%-49.00%-66.48%-49.54%-0.30%-52.26%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
65.71%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOW and TQQQ is -0.67, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

-0.75

The correlation between SDOW and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.75 (all time) to -0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDOW vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDOW
TQQQ

Financial Services

74.6%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

SDOW
74.6%
TQQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

SDOW

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

SDOW

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SDOW

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

SDOW

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

SDOW

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

SDOW

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

SDOW

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

SDOW

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

SDOW

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

SDOW

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDOW vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDOW
SDOW Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDOW vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDOWTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.19

3.07

-4.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.81

3.19

-4.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.42

-0.62

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

4.08

-5.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.58

13.38

-14.95

SDOW vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDOW Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDOW and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDOWTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.19

3.07

-4.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.57

0.45

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.73

0.69

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.78

0.74

-1.52

Drawdowns

SDOW vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOW drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOW and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDOWTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-81.66%

-18.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.45%

-36.97%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.39%

-58.04%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.35%

-81.66%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.26%

-81.66%

-17.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

0.00%

-99.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.43%

-18.53%

-70.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.35%

11.28%

+16.07%

Volatility

SDOW vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) is 8.83%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that SDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDOWTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.83%

13.26%

-4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.90%

36.05%

-8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.02%

47.63%

-11.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.26%

66.55%

-22.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.13%

65.98%

-13.85%

SDOW vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SDOW and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

SDOW vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDOW
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30
5.71%5.80%8.30%5.38%0.36%0.00%0.52%2.17%1.23%0.09%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDOW and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to SDOW (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOW dropped -99.96% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.44% vs -38.16% for SDOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SDOW has been the lower-risk option at 8.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.44% return vs -38.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDOW and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SDOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

SDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDOW and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer