SDOG vs. HYG
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDOG returned 9.59%/yr vs 4.94%/yr for HYG. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.
Performance
SDOG vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOG has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 9.59%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.94% annualized return.
SDOG
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
HYG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
SDOG vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.21% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.32% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and HYG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SDOG and HYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDOG vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOG
HYG
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDOG
HYG
-
Technology
SDOG
HYG
-
Financial Services
SDOG
HYG
-
Energy
SDOG
HYG
-
Consumer Defensive
SDOG
HYG
-
Healthcare
SDOG
HYG
-
Utilities
SDOG
HYG
Communication Services
SDOG
HYG
-
Industrials
SDOG
HYG
-
Basic Materials
SDOG
HYG
-
Real Estate
SDOG
-
HYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
HYG
SDOG vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDOG | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 1.72 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.26 | 2.59 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 2.79 | +1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 12.34 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDOG | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.72 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.50 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.60 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.46 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -34.25% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -2.34% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -4.56% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -15.79% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | -22.03% | -21.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.28% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -3.24% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.53% | +1.41% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.21%. This indicates that SDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 1.21% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 3.01% | +4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 3.81% | +7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 7.53% | +7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 8.29% | +10.77% |
SDOG vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than HYG's 5.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.92% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.35% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and HYG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDOG has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to HYG (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs HYG's -34.25%.
On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.59% vs 4.94% for HYG. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.59% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 3.35% for SDOG.
SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.49% for HYG.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer